Active Users:234 Time:24/04/2024 03:41:12 AM
I entirely agree ironclad Send a noteboard - 04/11/2012 07:21:50 PM
Figured I should beat it before playing 3...

So, here's the thing: Revelations is good, mechanically. Each AC game has gotten more and more polished. The Brotherhood recruiting mechanics, the city-building mechanics, the multiple weapons, the faction quests, and a lot more are all back.

And now they've added... bombs. And a Tower Defense minigame.

So that's the problem. Revelations is, more or less, a carbon copy of Brotherhood. So do you ding it for not being particularly innovative, or do you praise it for being a fun, polished game?

I'm about half of the way through the game, and I'm getting the same feeling that I did with Brotherhood- I don't care about the Renaissance anymore- I want to know about modern times. It's cool seeing Ezio as a badass middle-aged man, but I really want to see what's happening with Desmond and Abstergo.

I got the game for like 10 bucks at a Steam sale, and it's definitely worth that. But mostly I'm just going to power through this so I can play AC3.


I don't want to defend a street with barricades. I want to be on my own and assassinate people like in the first two games.
I also find Istanbul lacks the depth and versatility of Jerusalem. I'd prefer to travel.
I gave up on the game for a while to play other stuff now, but I'll be back in prep for part 3, I suppose.
*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Reply to message
Retro Review: Just started playing Assassin's Creed: Revelations - 03/11/2012 10:03:13 PM 556 Views
Valid points, one and all ... - 04/11/2012 02:41:49 AM 571 Views
Revelations was barely worth the time. - 04/11/2012 06:06:09 PM 646 Views
I entirely agree - 04/11/2012 07:21:50 PM 526 Views
Don't play it out unless ... - 05/11/2012 02:18:26 AM 546 Views
That "Lost Archive" thing? - 05/11/2012 06:20:19 PM 508 Views
The Subject '16' jumping missions (for external plot). - 08/11/2012 07:43:47 PM 540 Views

Reply to Message