The hard copy would obviously be more expensive than the downloaded one (one could hope).
But that would never last. It would be too expensive to produce a games machine that supported both download of games and physical copies.
But that would never last. It would be too expensive to produce a games machine that supported both download of games and physical copies.
"I didn't have much to say to anybody but kept to myself and my books. With my eyes closed, I would touch a familiar book and draw it's fragrance deep inside me. This was enough to make me happy."
— Haruki Murakami (Norwegian Wood
— Haruki Murakami (Norwegian Wood
This message last edited by Dragonsworn on 06/11/2009 at 08:20:39 PM
Digital distribution or not?
- 06/11/2009 05:06:30 PM
687 Views
I'm a collector, so digital distribution is not really for me.
- 06/11/2009 05:23:20 PM
386 Views
Er... have they not heard of Steam? It's not a long way off, at all
- 06/11/2009 05:24:18 PM
468 Views
They said "replaces."
- 06/11/2009 06:13:54 PM
430 Views
I feel like both should exist, like CDs, Magazines, etc. Digital will never 100% trump tangibility. *NM*
- 06/11/2009 07:54:19 PM
179 Views
"Never" is a rather foolish word to use. 
I agree though, it'll take a while. *NM*
- 06/11/2009 08:02:55 PM
191 Views
I agree though, it'll take a while. *NM*
- 06/11/2009 08:02:55 PM
191 Views
They might be able to coexist? For a while...
- 06/11/2009 08:18:33 PM
507 Views
Definate no.
- 07/11/2009 10:08:09 AM
351 Views
Why would pirating give you a hard copy?
- 08/11/2009 01:02:36 AM
391 Views
It does not.
- 08/11/2009 09:02:17 AM
403 Views