My original post on the subject was pretty reasonable, I thought. Some other people said similar things, F-T primarily, I believe. All I was saying was that someone who proposed a question was acting in a blatantly scummy way I was going to vote for them regardless.

And looking back on what I said in reply to you, I wasn't accusing you hypocritically, I was defending the whole concept of questions and answers as a good way to generate discussion and gather information. Which I still think it was.

I'm willing to bet that my support of that concept is what is currently making people think that I'm in league with Isaac, since he turned out to b evil. But I do believe that Isaac actually was looking for the other scum faction, and thus helping the Town look for scum (at least, scum not allied with him). When there's two scum factions, by default you're going to have to end up siding with one faction to lynch members of the other, to hunt out members of the other. Would Isaac have gotten all pissy when I messed up his carefully laid trap if we were on the same team? Maybe to throw people off. But like I said before, I think he was honestly looking for the other faction.



Kronin was caught in what amounted to a bald-faced lie with blatant contradictions in the given information.



Curse you, grammar, my evil nemesis!



I didn't push Napoleon into a claim. I wanted to know how he survived, to try and make sure he wasn't pulling another one of those "I was attacked on Night 1 and must be innocent" ploys. I didn't ask him to claim, he did that on his own. He could have gone for "I was protected" or "I think the Doc interfered" or something of that nature that didn't amount to a full claim. If he was lying, the real Doc would have known and his cover would have been blown, which was my objective in asking the question. But he decided the best option was to claim, which I was not very pleased by at all. I can't remember if I said anything at the time, but I do remember being annoyed, so that's good enough, isn't it?