I am not a Vigilante. You could say I am vigilant though, as I am a Watcher. I had been acting on the assumption that Fanatic-Templar was our vig. His last post makes that highly unlikely, so I now know we do have a serial killer instead.
I also now think that our serial killer is beetnemesis. Looking back, there are lots of little things pointing to his guilt, going all the way back to the gender discrepancy on Day 1. As I pointed out, Darth_Katie and Yunalesca claimed female characters and everyone else claimed male, except beetnemesis.
I was willing to chalk that up to coincidence at the time because really, why would someone lie about their character's gender? To facilitate a false claim of Beloved Princess, obviously. I had said before that that was a perfect fake roleclaim for scum, and it's even better for a serial killer. The one-shot bulletproof aspect discourages nightkills, and the threat of losing a day is excellent lynch protection.
I now suspect that beetnemesis lied from the very beginning of Day 1, in the response to his own question about gender, in order to set up his ideal fake claim. In a way, the fact that it fits so well makes it even more suspicious. In a game with Doctor Medea, Oedipus the cop, and above all a bulletproof Socrates, Kronin had no reason to deviate from the otherwise established plan of matching character and player genders. beet could just as easily have been Beloved Princess Homer or something.
My main reason for not suspecting beetnemesis before was that he could not be a member of the mafia due to his interactions with Stephen. Obviously, for a serial killer, that wouldn't matter. They would still have every reason to want each other dead.
There is another problem though. I expect that there is still another mafia member as well. It could be Hobo; a scum doublevoter seems a bit unlikely to me but not impossible, and Pericles as a character is the most likely of us to be going against the gods.
The existence of a serial killer breaks down my theory supporting Hobo's innocence. As he wouldn't be the only threat, losing the last of the mafia wouldn't be completely game-breaking. It would be like a repeat of the ending of the Pirates vs Ninjas game.
So if Hobo gets modkilled and we lynch beetnemesis, we might could win this today. Or if there really were only two mafia, then we can lynch beet for the win.
The problem comes into play if there is a third mafia member and Hobo isn't it. That would mean it's Gher, and that would mean that we lose if Hobo gets modkilled.
If Hobo gets modkilled and dies a townie, then we're down to beet, FT, Gher, and myself. If we lynch beet today, then Gher can kill me or FT tonight and the mafia will win. If we lynched Gher instead today, then beetnemesis could kill me or FT tonight and we'd have the first ever SK victory.
Hopefully it is Hobo and I'm just borrowing trouble. In any event, I now suggest we lynch our serial killer, beetnemesis.
I must commend you on your strategy, beet. That was very well-played. You had me completely fooled, but now the game is up.
Vote: beetnemesis
I also now think that our serial killer is beetnemesis. Looking back, there are lots of little things pointing to his guilt, going all the way back to the gender discrepancy on Day 1. As I pointed out, Darth_Katie and Yunalesca claimed female characters and everyone else claimed male, except beetnemesis.
I was willing to chalk that up to coincidence at the time because really, why would someone lie about their character's gender? To facilitate a false claim of Beloved Princess, obviously. I had said before that that was a perfect fake roleclaim for scum, and it's even better for a serial killer. The one-shot bulletproof aspect discourages nightkills, and the threat of losing a day is excellent lynch protection.
I now suspect that beetnemesis lied from the very beginning of Day 1, in the response to his own question about gender, in order to set up his ideal fake claim. In a way, the fact that it fits so well makes it even more suspicious. In a game with Doctor Medea, Oedipus the cop, and above all a bulletproof Socrates, Kronin had no reason to deviate from the otherwise established plan of matching character and player genders. beet could just as easily have been Beloved Princess Homer or something.
My main reason for not suspecting beetnemesis before was that he could not be a member of the mafia due to his interactions with Stephen. Obviously, for a serial killer, that wouldn't matter. They would still have every reason to want each other dead.
There is another problem though. I expect that there is still another mafia member as well. It could be Hobo; a scum doublevoter seems a bit unlikely to me but not impossible, and Pericles as a character is the most likely of us to be going against the gods.
The existence of a serial killer breaks down my theory supporting Hobo's innocence. As he wouldn't be the only threat, losing the last of the mafia wouldn't be completely game-breaking. It would be like a repeat of the ending of the Pirates vs Ninjas game.
So if Hobo gets modkilled and we lynch beetnemesis, we might could win this today. Or if there really were only two mafia, then we can lynch beet for the win.
The problem comes into play if there is a third mafia member and Hobo isn't it. That would mean it's Gher, and that would mean that we lose if Hobo gets modkilled.
If Hobo gets modkilled and dies a townie, then we're down to beet, FT, Gher, and myself. If we lynch beet today, then Gher can kill me or FT tonight and the mafia will win. If we lynched Gher instead today, then beetnemesis could kill me or FT tonight and we'd have the first ever SK victory.
Hopefully it is Hobo and I'm just borrowing trouble. In any event, I now suggest we lynch our serial killer, beetnemesis.
I must commend you on your strategy, beet. That was very well-played. You had me completely fooled, but now the game is up.
Vote: beetnemesis
Mafia 22: Further In
- 24/06/2011 03:18:35 AM
1359 Views
ranagrande, Gher? Thoughts? *NM*
- 28/06/2011 01:00:06 PM
372 Views
F-T and Rangrande, care to claim?
- 28/06/2011 06:40:10 PM
781 Views
Yeah, I think roleclaims from both of you would be very useful *NM*
- 29/06/2011 12:28:20 AM
376 Views
I doubt a roleclaim on my part is of any use at this junction.
- 29/06/2011 01:06:01 AM
833 Views
So... you'll roleclaim after ranagrande does?
- 29/06/2011 02:04:04 AM
726 Views
Unvote
- 01/07/2011 08:04:05 AM
918 Views
Interesting. And horrifying.
- 01/07/2011 09:18:55 AM
918 Views
Unvote (again)
- 01/07/2011 10:20:57 AM
894 Views
Hm. That's kinda brilliant.
- 01/07/2011 03:33:52 PM
799 Views
Oh, right. I'm vanilla. *NM*
- 01/07/2011 06:18:45 PM
371 Views
Would you mind unvoting until ranagrande accounts for himself?
- 01/07/2011 08:49:42 PM
746 Views
If we have only one, how did Isaac die? *NM*
- 02/07/2011 05:36:20 AM
387 Views
Hm. Maybe we've been looking at the Night one DK thing wrong?
- 02/07/2011 05:10:15 PM
874 Views
You still haven't accounted for anything.
- 02/07/2011 06:40:16 PM
851 Views
Psh. Am I the only one who thinks its patently obvious he's the scum?
- 03/07/2011 05:50:15 AM
743 Views
So, a Watcher? Who did you watch?
- 01/07/2011 03:02:58 PM
748 Views
Watchery Watchings
- 02/07/2011 06:05:27 AM
731 Views
F-T, did you get any indication that D_K and/or Ranagrande targeted you last night?
- 04/07/2011 04:27:56 PM
823 Views
No.
- 04/07/2011 06:39:16 PM
807 Views
That's odd.
- 05/07/2011 03:17:17 AM
762 Views
Our possibilities are obvious.
- 05/07/2011 03:23:25 AM
735 Views
Besides, unless I am given some actual reason to suspect otherwise,
- 05/07/2011 03:29:56 AM
951 Views
Hm. So, to be clear
- 05/07/2011 01:53:54 PM
823 Views
Right.
- 05/07/2011 08:28:28 PM
838 Views
Hm. I guess I just can't shake the feeling I'm being played, somehow.
- 05/07/2011 09:55:17 PM
825 Views
RBIRL. Impeccable timing, I know.
- 01/07/2011 09:44:10 PM
804 Views
Is Hobo dead?
- 03/07/2011 02:48:50 AM
773 Views
I think he's effectively modkilled. A firm ruling would be nice, though. *NM*
- 03/07/2011 05:50:59 AM
372 Views
Whoa...
- 06/07/2011 06:02:53 AM
826 Views
Currently on a bus again. Rana, why did you watch who you did?
- 07/07/2011 02:14:05 AM
812 Views
Do all the Idrians have Scottish accents?
- 07/07/2011 01:15:01 PM
699 Views
Yup. I guess its a "Highlands" thing?
- 07/07/2011 08:42:05 PM
707 Views
Re: Currently on a bus again. Rana, why did you watch who you did?
- 08/07/2011 07:08:46 AM
814 Views
Also, RBIRL again
- 08/07/2011 07:12:52 AM
688 Views
I'm gone this weekend too, but not long enough to need a RBIRL. *NM*
- 08/07/2011 06:04:34 PM
361 Views
Eh. I was going to write up an analysis, but I was going around in circles.
- 09/07/2011 01:21:42 AM
818 Views

