You meant decoding the "also", not the names. That might work. Still, we have other things to go by first.
There really is no way to decode without exposing the doc then... forgot... however I think we might still want it on the table, I am the one who on day 1 said FT wasn't a cult enthusiast but not because I didn't think he'd have one, rather because I thought he'd try to weaken or balance them in some fashion if they were in play, which the protoss probably does. We'll probably find out, but I doubt it. I think we have a cult so I think we're probably LyLo and need to do everything we can to increase the odds of a succesful lynch today, again the Doc may not matter anymore except as a normal player though, if it's a cult he's probably not equipped to handle that, more likely if we have anti-cult abilities someone else does.
Still I'm a lot more reluctant to decode with the reminder our doc has a name.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Mafia Day 2 - Early Expansion
- 02/07/2012 09:18:28 AM
2106 Views
Also we might want to decode in whole or part
- 02/07/2012 12:53:30 PM
640 Views
Not in favor right now
- 02/07/2012 04:20:17 PM
655 Views
Ow, wait, I think I see what you mean now
- 02/07/2012 04:23:19 PM
537 Views
No, I actually forgot the doc's name-tied.
- 02/07/2012 04:31:32 PM
615 Views
Hypocopping?
- 02/07/2012 03:42:46 PM
937 Views
Sure, why not. It's not like it would hurt us even if we gain nothing. *NM*
- 02/07/2012 04:40:23 PM
247 Views
Hah, I forgot about hypocopping. Sure, let's do it, I'll make a seperate post. *NM*
- 02/07/2012 06:04:03 PM
291 Views
So, what should we do? *NM*
- 04/07/2012 04:00:50 PM
285 Views
Some next steps
- 04/07/2012 07:46:00 PM
680 Views
About exposing the doc...
- 05/07/2012 05:07:14 AM
515 Views
I have a stimpack as well.
- 05/07/2012 12:48:16 PM
545 Views
Actually I do
- 05/07/2012 03:02:30 PM
534 Views
So, did anyone have anything happen to them last night? *NM*
- 06/07/2012 08:06:30 PM
297 Views
Well, someone probably got a message saying 'You are now Zerg'...
- 07/07/2012 12:10:36 AM
553 Views
I suppose I'll share what happened to me last night.
- 07/07/2012 07:59:43 PM
580 Views
Let me probe on that one real quick
- 07/07/2012 08:46:45 PM
544 Views
Yes, it is specific.
- 07/07/2012 09:10:39 PM
518 Views
Re: Yes, it is specific.
- 07/07/2012 10:10:13 PM
561 Views
It was in my original role message. *NM*
- 07/07/2012 10:41:11 PM
301 Views
Oh well, I'll take the bait.
- 08/07/2012 01:33:28 AM
687 Views
EBWOP: Oh well, I'll take the bait.
- 08/07/2012 01:34:22 AM
720 Views
I actually kind of expected that
- 08/07/2012 01:38:48 AM
599 Views
Could hear a pindrop in here...
- 08/07/2012 06:31:22 AM
580 Views
Yeah, I went to bed just after posting that.
- 08/07/2012 11:47:01 AM
766 Views
Well I've got to say your encryption is, uh, vague
- 08/07/2012 06:58:13 PM
620 Views
Seems pretty straight forward. Vote: Isaac *NM*
- 09/07/2012 12:11:03 AM
237 Views
Hmm wait...
- 09/07/2012 01:49:23 AM
603 Views
The Casy name thing is in the message I got from FT.
- 09/07/2012 10:20:49 AM
741 Views
I am not voting at this time.
- 09/07/2012 06:47:18 PM
452 Views
This has none of my fingerprints on it, something is clearly up and it literally can't be my doing
- 09/07/2012 08:59:45 PM
570 Views
Vote: Stephen
- 09/07/2012 11:59:46 PM
503 Views
You mean the whole thing where I have been brutally honest and told you everything.
- 10/07/2012 12:12:06 AM
808 Views
No, I mean the totally useless bogus encryption. *NM*
- 10/07/2012 12:26:26 AM
276 Views
Useless and bogus?
- 10/07/2012 02:04:40 PM
724 Views
The main complaint is that your code doesn't contain any role information- HOWEVER
- 10/07/2012 03:01:45 PM
650 Views
Isaac- you said you have a stimpack that doesn't protect against infestation?
- 10/07/2012 04:40:18 AM
1079 Views
Not explicitly, that's why I was fishing with Ranagrande
- 10/07/2012 05:15:47 AM
489 Views
Oh, I see....
- 10/07/2012 07:10:13 AM
671 Views
Vote: Isaac (again)
- 10/07/2012 03:03:04 PM
770 Views
Vote: Stephen, but FOS: Beet, what heck?
- 10/07/2012 06:58:10 PM
583 Views
Unvote. Didn't you claim different symptoms than everyone else, though?
- 10/07/2012 09:18:38 PM
705 Views
Specifically I claimed a symptom that wasn't explcitly listed as one in my RM
- 10/07/2012 11:01:57 PM
519 Views
