So, we all say who we protected last night? As soon as we find the Doc, we can look back to the answers, see how was protected in the first Night, and maybe deduce who (if any) was targeted? Either there was no NK, or the NK was unsuccessful.
We may also get a clue about the infestation spreading. The protected person was not infected in that night. Assuming that protecting a person will also help against infestation. Which might not be the case...
Would it be useful? Who would be in favor of this?
We may also get a clue about the infestation spreading. The protected person was not infected in that night. Assuming that protecting a person will also help against infestation. Which might not be the case...
Would it be useful? Who would be in favor of this?
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
Mafia Day 2 - Early Expansion
- 02/07/2012 09:18:28 AM
2073 Views
Also we might want to decode in whole or part
- 02/07/2012 12:53:30 PM
610 Views
Not in favor right now
- 02/07/2012 04:20:17 PM
625 Views
Hypocopping?
- 02/07/2012 03:42:46 PM
907 Views
Sure, why not. It's not like it would hurt us even if we gain nothing. *NM*
- 02/07/2012 04:40:23 PM
234 Views
Hah, I forgot about hypocopping. Sure, let's do it, I'll make a seperate post. *NM*
- 02/07/2012 06:04:03 PM
275 Views
If Hypocopping is a thing, is Metadoccing too?
- 03/07/2012 07:11:51 AM
507 Views
So, what should we do? *NM*
- 04/07/2012 04:00:50 PM
273 Views
Some next steps
- 04/07/2012 07:46:00 PM
648 Views
About exposing the doc...
- 05/07/2012 05:07:14 AM
487 Views
I have a stimpack as well.
- 05/07/2012 12:48:16 PM
523 Views
Actually I do
- 05/07/2012 03:02:30 PM
507 Views
So, did anyone have anything happen to them last night? *NM*
- 06/07/2012 08:06:30 PM
285 Views
Well, someone probably got a message saying 'You are now Zerg'...
- 07/07/2012 12:10:36 AM
518 Views
I suppose I'll share what happened to me last night.
- 07/07/2012 07:59:43 PM
553 Views
Let me probe on that one real quick
- 07/07/2012 08:46:45 PM
507 Views
Yes, it is specific.
- 07/07/2012 09:10:39 PM
489 Views
Re: Yes, it is specific.
- 07/07/2012 10:10:13 PM
537 Views
It was in my original role message. *NM*
- 07/07/2012 10:41:11 PM
291 Views
Oh well, I'll take the bait.
- 08/07/2012 01:33:28 AM
663 Views
EBWOP: Oh well, I'll take the bait.
- 08/07/2012 01:34:22 AM
692 Views
I actually kind of expected that
- 08/07/2012 01:38:48 AM
576 Views
Could hear a pindrop in here...
- 08/07/2012 06:31:22 AM
553 Views
Yeah, I went to bed just after posting that.
- 08/07/2012 11:47:01 AM
744 Views
Well I've got to say your encryption is, uh, vague
- 08/07/2012 06:58:13 PM
590 Views
Seems pretty straight forward. Vote: Isaac *NM*
- 09/07/2012 12:11:03 AM
224 Views
Hmm wait...
- 09/07/2012 01:49:23 AM
567 Views
The Casy name thing is in the message I got from FT.
- 09/07/2012 10:20:49 AM
714 Views
I am not voting at this time.
- 09/07/2012 06:47:18 PM
423 Views
This has none of my fingerprints on it, something is clearly up and it literally can't be my doing
- 09/07/2012 08:59:45 PM
544 Views
Vote: Stephen
- 09/07/2012 11:59:46 PM
478 Views
You mean the whole thing where I have been brutally honest and told you everything.
- 10/07/2012 12:12:06 AM
774 Views
No, I mean the totally useless bogus encryption. *NM*
- 10/07/2012 12:26:26 AM
262 Views
Useless and bogus?
- 10/07/2012 02:04:40 PM
690 Views
The main complaint is that your code doesn't contain any role information- HOWEVER
- 10/07/2012 03:01:45 PM
629 Views
Isaac- you said you have a stimpack that doesn't protect against infestation?
- 10/07/2012 04:40:18 AM
1052 Views
Not explicitly, that's why I was fishing with Ranagrande
- 10/07/2012 05:15:47 AM
464 Views
Oh, I see....
- 10/07/2012 07:10:13 AM
631 Views
Vote: Isaac (again)
- 10/07/2012 03:03:04 PM
740 Views
Vote: Stephen, but FOS: Beet, what heck?
- 10/07/2012 06:58:10 PM
551 Views
Unvote. Didn't you claim different symptoms than everyone else, though?
- 10/07/2012 09:18:38 PM
677 Views
Specifically I claimed a symptom that wasn't explcitly listed as one in my RM
- 10/07/2012 11:01:57 PM
492 Views
