... which I only just thought of as I hit submit, is that the Doctor's presence on the TARDIS, within the Dalek ship, was required to keep the shields down so that the space-plane could attack. He planned to slip away as the ship fell apart, and since he left early to stop the bomb, the shields would have gone back up and the attack would have been useless.
So, maybe that's it?
They could have made it a little clearer, if that's the explanation. I find myself unsatisfied with the writing of this particular episode.
So, maybe that's it?
They could have made it a little clearer, if that's the explanation. I find myself unsatisfied with the writing of this particular episode.
I assumed that was the reason though they should have done something to make it clear that it was.
Apart from that though, I liked it as an episode.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
The latest Doctor Who. Zuh?
- 20/04/2010 11:39:25 PM
627 Views
The only thing I can think of ...
- 20/04/2010 11:44:45 PM
502 Views
Yes
- 21/04/2010 10:57:43 AM
540 Views
I have to say I was disappointed
- 21/04/2010 05:34:27 PM
546 Views