It was okay, but in a few places it felt like a re-working of the silence in the library scenario - understandable given Moffat's role in both. But the Angel using Bob's voice sounded like a straight out rip off, and a little lazy. Soldiers/Priests substituted for scientists in the library story, a building that has been empty for 4 hundred years seemed like other aspects from the library template. And the River Song character wasn't as enjoyable second time round. (I don't know why.)
The Doctor and Amy are starting to bond well, and I am seeing Matt Smith as the Doctor in his own right, and his own character. Still, it was much better than last weeks Dalek story.
PS Still not sure where they are going with the glowing wound that is unsubtely seen in every episode.
The Doctor and Amy are starting to bond well, and I am seeing Matt Smith as the Doctor in his own right, and his own character. Still, it was much better than last weeks Dalek story.
PS Still not sure where they are going with the glowing wound that is unsubtely seen in every episode.
I T'was Jartreb Doorn
/Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers*
- 24/04/2010 07:53:37 PM
831 Views
Amy is growing on me.
- 24/04/2010 08:19:43 PM
716 Views
Re: Amy is growing on me.
- 24/04/2010 08:21:44 PM
710 Views
She seems as if she believes everything she says to be highly witty.
- 24/04/2010 08:23:51 PM
700 Views
Re: /Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers*
- 25/04/2010 03:31:03 PM
692 Views
Well, that answered the question about what the Doctor was shooting.
- 26/04/2010 11:20:01 AM
646 Views
True. And satisfactorily.
- 26/04/2010 05:19:12 PM
721 Views
Regarding River Song...
- 26/04/2010 05:36:30 PM
784 Views
Re: Regarding River Song...
- 26/04/2010 05:41:51 PM
634 Views