Active Users:401 Time:16/06/2025 08:41:40 PM
Re: /Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* Camilla Send a noteboard - 25/04/2010 03:35:59 PM
It was okay, but in a few places it felt like a re-working of the silence in the library scenario - understandable given Moffat's role in both. But the Angel using Bob's voice sounded like a straight out rip off, and a little lazy. Soldiers/Priests substituted for scientists in the library story, a building that has been empty for 4 hundred years seemed like other aspects from the library template. And the River Song character wasn't as enjoyable second time round. (I don't know why.)


I found it to be a bit of a hybrid of Silence in the Library, Blink (obviously) and the Empty Child, all together. I don't remember why it reminded me of the latter, but it struck me.

I agree about River Song. I watched the library episodes afterwards, and she really is more subtle and acts with a wider range in the older episodes. I don't know why. Maybe there was a better director?

The Doctor and Amy are starting to bond well, and I am seeing Matt Smith as the Doctor in his own right, and his own character. Still, it was much better than last weeks Dalek story.

PS Still not sure where they are going with the glowing wound that is unsubtely seen in every episode.


It looks like something will happen with that in the next episode. It might explain the weird discrepancy between real time and what we have seen before. And possibly also the oddity of River Song showing up only after the Doctor has regenerated.

If the universe has cracks, it could conceivably be due to something the Doctor did in his semi-mad period, if he failed to respect something that was a fixed point in time for example. I don't know. I am very intrigued.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
/Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* - 24/04/2010 07:53:37 PM 777 Views
Amy is growing on me. - 24/04/2010 08:19:43 PM 674 Views
Re: Amy is growing on me. - 24/04/2010 08:21:44 PM 656 Views
She seems as if she believes everything she says to be highly witty. - 24/04/2010 08:23:51 PM 657 Views
Started well, ended badly - 24/04/2010 08:21:14 PM 571 Views
Re: Started well, ended badly - 24/04/2010 08:22:50 PM 620 Views
I liked that one. - 25/04/2010 03:26:26 AM 674 Views
Re: I liked that one. - 25/04/2010 10:04:05 AM 702 Views
Re: /Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* - 25/04/2010 03:31:03 PM 646 Views
Re: /Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* - 25/04/2010 03:35:59 PM 585 Views
That episode was well terrifying. - 25/04/2010 11:44:35 PM 873 Views
Re: That episode was well terrifying. - 26/04/2010 09:13:45 AM 631 Views
I'm a much happier bunny this week - 26/04/2010 10:12:55 AM 726 Views
Re: I'm a much happier bunny this week - 26/04/2010 10:19:21 AM 695 Views
Well, that answered the question about what the Doctor was shooting. - 26/04/2010 11:20:01 AM 595 Views
True. And satisfactorily. - 26/04/2010 05:19:12 PM 679 Views
And roughly as I suggested - 26/04/2010 05:24:41 PM 579 Views
Re: And roughly as I suggested - 26/04/2010 05:27:07 PM 574 Views
It was good. - 26/04/2010 01:48:27 PM 582 Views
Re: It was good. - 26/04/2010 05:19:50 PM 540 Views
Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:36:30 PM 729 Views
Re: Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:41:51 PM 578 Views
Re: Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:51:24 PM 701 Views
Re: Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:55:29 PM 619 Views
Just caught it online. - 30/04/2010 04:18:52 AM 528 Views
Re: Just caught it online. - 30/04/2010 08:04:24 AM 605 Views

Reply to Message