Active Users:397 Time:13/05/2025 01:29:55 PM
Speaking of protecting the candidates. Or not. ironclad Send a noteboard - 28/05/2010 08:14:50 AM
But she is seriously botching her job of protecting the candidates if that was her. Unless it was one of those "Hey, one of our outriggers are missing! There it is out there! I can't tell who it is using it but let's shoot at them."

Having just watched this episode last weekend:
In early season 1 most main characters were candidates, presumably. Charlie's name was in the cave later. Why did Ethan and the Others think it was a good idea to HANG HIM so they could get preggers Claire. Jacob, I am looking at you!
*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Reply to message
Lost: The Outrigger Canoe gunfight *spoilers* - 28/05/2010 12:17:34 AM 576 Views
I too assumed it was Ilana's people at the time. - 28/05/2010 12:26:20 AM 257 Views
Speaking of protecting the candidates. Or not. - 28/05/2010 08:14:50 AM 264 Views
Re: Speaking of protecting the candidates. Or not. - 28/05/2010 11:30:30 PM 280 Views
Yes remember early in season 3, when Pickett wanted to kill them "He's not even on Jacob's list" - 29/05/2010 03:38:24 AM 276 Views
Not the same list - 29/05/2010 10:49:22 PM 322 Views
Yeah true, that makes sense *NM* - 29/05/2010 11:00:19 AM 108 Views
The Frenchmen--not sure the timing works - 28/05/2010 02:31:43 AM 284 Views
I'm trying to remember the exact sequence... - 28/05/2010 03:24:39 AM 267 Views

Reply to Message