Active Users:305 Time:10/05/2024 03:07:12 AM
I think that's a bit simplistic. Tom Send a noteboard - 03/06/2010 04:16:02 PM
If the series had been extended, we would certainly have seen a back story that would have called into question his loyalty to the crew. Hell, I think the same would have held true about Inara.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Firefly question - 31/05/2010 11:32:25 PM 824 Views
It was probably a teaser for a whole plot sequence that never ended up being used. - 01/06/2010 12:02:38 AM 584 Views
I liked what Inara told him: - 01/06/2010 12:13:20 AM 566 Views
I think that's a bit simplistic. - 03/06/2010 04:16:02 PM 453 Views
Because it was about the journey, not about getting somewhere? - 01/06/2010 09:14:32 AM 597 Views
a shepard needs a flock... *NM* - 01/06/2010 12:02:43 PM 233 Views
What Camilla and Mix said. Basically, he was just wandering - 02/06/2010 07:05:57 AM 484 Views
I always wondered, but have no proof - 03/06/2010 04:09:33 PM 626 Views
That would be an interesting contrast to Mal. - 03/06/2010 05:11:19 PM 480 Views
Oh, that is a good idea. - 03/06/2010 06:07:07 PM 452 Views
me too *NM* - 04/06/2010 12:54:17 AM 181 Views
Re: I always wondered, but have no proof - 05/06/2010 06:42:27 PM 652 Views
an Operative probably makes more sense based on the knowledge he's shown - 05/06/2010 11:59:29 PM 454 Views
He was never really heading to a particular place... - 05/06/2010 06:45:46 PM 527 Views

Reply to Message