Active Users:361 Time:30/04/2025 01:43:23 PM
I think the British version sounds like they are not trying at all. Darth_Katie Send a noteboard - 05/06/2010 10:21:19 PM
It seems to me that "Goff" is basically just following the rules of English pronunciation, like the word rough or cough. But then there's also through or bough so I guess the "Go" pronunciation is not much better. But it seems more like an attempt to pronounce it correctly to me (more "not English") ... probably I am biased because I like that pronunciation better and it's the one I'm used to.
Insert theme music here.
Reply to message
/Doctor Who: regarding the upcoming episode... Some clips and sliiiiiight spoiler, depending on - 04/06/2010 01:04:39 PM 299 Views
Looks good! - 04/06/2010 06:52:12 PM 242 Views
Re: Looks good! - 04/06/2010 06:53:36 PM 236 Views
So what's the proper pronunciation? - 05/06/2010 01:23:55 AM 283 Views
Re: So what's the proper pronunciation? - 05/06/2010 08:56:39 AM 246 Views
"Goff" is just silly. It doesn't make sense according to any rules of pronunciation. - 05/06/2010 02:02:47 AM 265 Views
Re: "Goff" is just silly. It doesn't make sense according to any rules of pronunciation. - 05/06/2010 09:00:27 AM 253 Views
It should probably be ki:-SHO:-te: - 05/06/2010 05:29:49 PM 248 Views
Maybe, probably not - 05/06/2010 05:55:30 PM 241 Views
No, certainly so. Carochi's Grammar of Nahuatl from 1645 conclusively disproves your wikipedia. - 06/06/2010 04:32:52 AM 251 Views
Quite possibly. - 06/06/2010 09:45:20 AM 234 Views
See...there was a logical flaw in your use of wikipedia. - 06/06/2010 02:21:44 PM 212 Views
I think the British version sounds like they are not trying at all. - 05/06/2010 10:21:19 PM 234 Views
I found this about the pronounciation. - 05/06/2010 04:22:44 AM 253 Views
Re: I found this about the pronounciation. - 05/06/2010 09:02:13 AM 249 Views

Reply to Message