Active Users:484 Time:18/09/2025 04:30:37 PM
I think that's kind of the point though. Joel Send a noteboard - 09/06/2010 03:41:33 PM
There's a time and a place for cursing ... title of a widely-released movie is not one of them, in my opinion. If you want to convey to the audience what kind of movie it is, there are a bajillion other ways to do it.

I mean, really, nothing about the behavior or relationship changes a whit by simply calling it what it is. The euphemism simply indulges the conceit that it's something more noble, or less crude.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
So, Is "Friends with Benefits" a Bad Title? - 08/06/2010 06:59:10 PM 509 Views
Depends on the target audience, I suppose *NM* - 08/06/2010 10:53:37 PM 171 Views
It has the bonus of not being obscene. - 09/06/2010 12:59:27 AM 353 Views
I think that's kind of the point though. - 09/06/2010 03:41:33 PM 447 Views
Sounds like a real winner... *NM* - 09/06/2010 02:58:26 PM 173 Views
Like you'd say no to casual sex with Natalie Portman. - 09/06/2010 03:42:31 PM 470 Views
Pass on the movie and the offer, though... - 09/06/2010 03:54:39 PM 339 Views

Reply to Message