Active Users:296 Time:17/05/2024 09:30:54 PM
Cool, thanks for the reply beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 24/09/2010 06:08:10 AM
1) The Battle Royale act is a well-known thing- the movie opens up with the previous year's winner, smiling, with tons of news coverage.

The purpose of the Battle Royale act was... well, I'm not sure. Because kids don't respect their elders, so this will show them who has the power? But the kids had obviously never heard of Battle Royale, so this doesn't seem to work very well.


In the book the BR game is more well-known, and feared by the students. They are clued in to what is going on much earlier.

The novel is also much more overtly set in an alternate-history world where Imperial Japan survived WW2 in some undisclosed fashion (it didn't win, since the USA is referenced and the main character is a huge Bruce Springsteen fan) and the county is a dictatorship with no human rights. The movie is much more vague on what is going on in the outside world.

What the hell was up with the scene with her and Evil Teacher eating ice cream, and he talks about what it's like to be an adult?


Evil Teacher in the movie isn't necessarily entirely Evil, just being worn down into doing something terrible by the system and his horrendous relationship with his wife and daughter. That scene (a flashback to an incident back at school when he counselled Noriko) was a brief display that there is, or was, a real human being lurking in there somewhere.

So, what, they can just randomly draft any survivors of previous games? Good Transfer Student was apparently a survivor of the game three years ago. Why is he back?

How did he know how to take off the collars? Evil Teacher said something about him hacking in and stealing that information?


Good Transfer Student got into the game again surreptitiously to sabotage it from the inside. Demented Bad Transfer Student got in officially to make things more interesting for the players.

In the book, IIRC, Bad Transfer Student is actually a normal member of the class who just goes nuts when put on the island.

4) So, in the climax, is this what happened: Good Transfer Student PRETENDS to shoot Whiny Guy and Stupid Girl, and then takes off their collars so it's like they're dead?


Correct.

5) Remember when Evil Teacher got shot like 20 times in the gut and collapses on the floor? And then his cell phone rings, and he's all "One second, I've gotta take this?" And then he eats a cookie, and dies? What the fuck was that?


Before he dies, the teacher has to round off his troubled relationship with his daughter (which has been ongoing through phone calls and messages throughout the movie). If this was a mainstream Western flick, he'd make his peace with her. As this is a f-ed up Japanese movie, his last act is to tell her to ESAD instead.

6) Why did they keep showing that damn basketball game?


It's a call-back to a relatively normal time when the kids in the class interacted with one another normally. It's meant to show how far they've fallen once they're on the island and out to kill one another. Or something.

8)The very end. Is this what happened: Good Transfer Student faked Stupid Girl and Whiny Guy's deaths, so Evil Teacher says Battle Royale is over. Evil Teacher tells everyone to go home, figuring he'll talk to Good Transfer Student later. The trio reveal themselves, kill Evil Teacher, and then grab a convenient boat back to the mainland (and GTS dies en route).

Why were Stupid Girl and Whiny Guy then wanted for murder? Was it because they supposedly killed classmates, or because they killed Evil Teacher?


Stupid Girl and Whiny Guy are wanted less for murder than for basically escaping from the game and breaking its rules. Also, and the film is vague on this part, after they get back to the mainland they become terrorists, join up with other dissidents and start blowing up government buildings in a fit of freedom-seeking vengeance.

The movie's sequel (the book doesn't have one, yet) goes into that a little more, but is hamstrung by the director going stark raving insane due to 9/11 and using the film to bash American foreign policy repeatedly in a manner that totally destroys any coherent point the film was trying to make. It's worth watching for the bit where they take the mickey out of SAVING PRIVATE RYAN's D-Day landings though.

I'd strongly recommend reading the novel, which is better than the film. Also check out the Wikipedia entry for the movie, which clarifies the plot a bit more.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
Battle Royale was awesome, but what the hell? (spoilers) - 17/09/2010 06:07:26 AM 669 Views
This is why I strongly believe in reading the book before seeing any film made of it. - 17/09/2010 09:41:44 AM 691 Views
No, it was on purpose! He was a "transfer student" - 17/09/2010 02:49:21 PM 421 Views
I honestly had no idea there was a book. - 18/09/2010 08:15:09 AM 464 Views
I really loved it, but I read it a long time ago. - 18/09/2010 12:11:38 PM 650 Views
It has a completely reason for the BR Act, as well - 27/09/2010 07:25:34 AM 405 Views
It was my understanding that.... - 17/09/2010 10:12:57 AM 478 Views
Re: Battle Royale was awesome, but what the hell? (spoilers) - 19/09/2010 10:42:07 PM 521 Views
I got some of that- the whole anti-youth thing was interesting - 23/09/2010 02:39:16 AM 437 Views
Like Tim said: - 27/09/2010 07:35:18 AM 531 Views
Re: Battle Royale was awesome, but what the hell? (spoilers) - 23/09/2010 11:04:11 PM 516 Views
Cool, thanks for the reply - 24/09/2010 06:08:10 AM 507 Views

Reply to Message