Or something.
Whaddya think?
For starters, that's why those movies can get away with a PG rating - because the faceless underlings who get mowed down lack any defining human characteristics. Compare with Revenge of the Sith (which got a PG - 13 rating), in which the viewer is treated to the brutal massacre of Jedi who look like clearly defined individuals, among other things.
Also lasers = no blood, except for when Obi-Wan cuts that guy's arm off in the cantina ...
Which is weird because doesn't the lightsaber immediately cauterize(sp?) any wound? So there shouldn't be blood right?
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
The biggest Star Wars plot hole explained by science.
- 15/11/2010 10:31:39 PM
1111 Views
I think that's a wonderful explanation!
- 16/11/2010 05:18:50 AM
697 Views
Re: I think that's a wonderful explanation!
- 16/11/2010 06:21:34 AM
741 Views
If only they didn't add the usual "there is only one trilogy" whining crap
- 16/11/2010 02:37:37 PM
676 Views
Did someone make a second one? Surely you didn't mean those overbudget, poorly written fan films? *NM*
- 16/11/2010 09:55:36 PM
304 Views
I've read about that study they mention, and there is still a plot hole...
- 18/11/2010 01:51:47 AM
789 Views