Active Users:168 Time:18/05/2024 07:47:22 PM
I could sum up that review in a few words... MalkierKnight Send a noteboard - 18/04/2011 08:56:03 AM
"I don't like fantasy, therefore this show sucks."

Hardly any of the claims she made about the show lead to it sucking. The only one, that sex was thrown in, seemed to be a standard of one of the other shows the author claims to enjoy: Rome. The sex in that was so thrown in they had to get TWO directors. One for the serious scenes, that are historically accurate, and another for the historically inaccurate sex romps.

This review also fails unimaginable hard for the simple reason that you can predict it was written by a non-fantasy fan woman. Maybe I'm generalizing to have done that, but I was right.

Her other criticisms? Not sure, seems like most of them would suggest that the series has a lot to tell and is just getting started. If she bothered five minutes of background research she'd know that a massive story is about to be told, hence a possibly slow start.

Also, her poor attempt at picking out a motif made me lose a lot of respect for her review. Asserting that there is some type of global warming commentary going on with the whole "winter is coming" motif is just moronic. While there might be parallels between global warming and a ten-year winter just around the corner, it seems to me that Martin is trying to talk about something that underlies both threats. The human tendency to become complacent and weak, which is a driving force behind the books. Had Ms. Bellafante realized this she might not have criticized the show for having little to say.

And if she had half monkey's intelligence she'd know not to say that a show has nothing to say after one episode.

Personally I thought the show did move a little quickly, and threw a lot of people new to the series into situations that were confusing. That is a valid criticism, but seems to me to be a necessary one. Ultimate judgment on the show will have to wait for a few more eps.

What is immediately clear, though, is that the show is well made. Nothing looks fake or cheesy and the acting is solid. Which already puts it above most shows.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
This message last edited by MalkierKnight on 18/04/2011 at 09:04:51 AM
Reply to message
"Game Of Thrones" reviews under fire.... - 17/04/2011 06:36:14 PM 1939 Views
obviously I should check the Books board more often... - 17/04/2011 06:43:18 PM 634 Views
I think it belongs here anyway. - 17/04/2011 06:50:40 PM 790 Views
I agree with you, although - 17/04/2011 10:14:41 PM 641 Views
Not sure what you're saying there. - 18/04/2011 12:27:13 AM 526 Views
so? the "book club women" do not represent all women - 18/04/2011 12:38:43 AM 672 Views
Ladies, it was a failed (I guess) zinger =) - 18/04/2011 01:30:20 AM 582 Views
Re: Ladies, it was a failed (I guess) zinger =) - 18/04/2011 04:24:53 AM 484 Views
Re: Ladies, it was a failed (I guess) zinger =) - 18/04/2011 11:11:49 PM 462 Views
I could sum up that review in a few words... - 18/04/2011 08:56:03 AM 784 Views
I'm gonna have to check this show out. - 18/04/2011 03:13:37 PM 531 Views
Am I reading it wrong, or is someone out there claiming the T & A is aimed at women? - 19/04/2011 07:05:57 PM 510 Views
you know us ladies. - 19/04/2011 11:50:21 PM 510 Views

Reply to Message