Active Users:391 Time:01/05/2025 09:52:22 AM
No. *NM* Camilla Send a noteboard - 27/05/2011 09:55:29 AM
Supposedly the "12 regenerations limit" was to be addressed early in this season; supposedly in a casual brush off type thing.

Or was it SJA that they were referring to?

I still think they should have dealt with it under the Time Lord Victorious concept.

Was it covered there?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
/Doctor Who: The Rebel Flesh *spoiler* - 22/05/2011 01:33:50 PM 775 Views
What if - 22/05/2011 02:16:44 PM 535 Views
Re: What if - 22/05/2011 02:25:29 PM 550 Views
Fairly so-so episode - 22/05/2011 03:25:36 PM 596 Views
Re: Fairly so-so episode - 22/05/2011 03:35:25 PM 719 Views
Re: Fairly so-so episode - 22/05/2011 03:53:39 PM 709 Views
I think someone read my first post about the fifth series last year - 22/05/2011 08:47:58 PM 930 Views
Mentioned in an interview last year with the show runners... - 26/05/2011 03:08:21 AM 565 Views
Huh - 26/05/2011 09:30:01 AM 588 Views
Did they mean that it would be dealt with separately to the Sarah Jane Adventures? - 26/05/2011 09:58:03 AM 609 Views
The SJA stuff was not good enough. - 26/05/2011 12:03:22 PM 606 Views
I agree - 26/05/2011 02:35:56 PM 571 Views
Re: I agree - 26/05/2011 02:37:27 PM 527 Views
Last season hasn't aired yet in the US. - 27/05/2011 02:23:18 AM 596 Views
No. *NM* - 27/05/2011 09:55:29 AM 239 Views
If you mean the Sarah Jane Adventures, then possibly - 27/05/2011 03:07:12 PM 549 Views
Re: /Doctor Who: The Rebel Flesh *spoiler* - 26/05/2011 07:05:56 PM 558 Views
Re: /Doctor Who: The Rebel Flesh *spoiler* - 26/05/2011 09:22:32 PM 622 Views
Re: /Doctor Who: The Rebel Flesh *spoiler* - 27/05/2011 02:06:56 AM 553 Views
The one right before this was brilliant. - 27/05/2011 03:30:48 AM 562 Views

Reply to Message