Active Users:413 Time:17/06/2025 08:02:15 PM
This is my take on it as well. *NM* Camilla Send a noteboard - 02/06/2011 03:08:40 PM
Didn't really want to start a new thread for this, but can someone tell me why after spending the entire story telling us that gangers have the right to live, it's okay for the Doctor to just disintegrates Amy's ganger at the end?

I think the reason the Doctor went there was to study the Flesh and realised that while the gangers were life forms in their own right, Flesh Amy wasn't - it had no mind of its own but was just Amy's projected into it so he was safe to destroy it.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
/Doctor Who: I object! -no spoilers - 28/05/2011 04:17:28 PM 759 Views
It is very, very annoying - 28/05/2011 04:32:39 PM 594 Views
This is the unfortunate result of the new DVD-release schedule - 28/05/2011 07:46:37 PM 608 Views
The whole point of a cliffhanger... *Spoilers* - 28/05/2011 07:42:34 PM 575 Views
Re: The whole point of a cliffhanger... *Spoilers* - 29/05/2011 02:08:44 AM 586 Views
Re: The whole point of a cliffhanger... *Spoilers* - 29/05/2011 03:19:35 PM 519 Views
No, Russelll T. Davis is evil - 28/05/2011 07:59:01 PM 737 Views
*Spoilers* - Question about this episode - 02/06/2011 09:11:51 AM 527 Views
I think - 02/06/2011 11:59:28 AM 572 Views
Different technology - 02/06/2011 12:23:45 PM 527 Views
This is my take on it as well. *NM* - 02/06/2011 03:08:40 PM 213 Views

Reply to Message