Active Users:187 Time:19/05/2024 07:52:56 AM
Nice theory, however... Wibble Send a noteboard - 07/06/2011 01:42:30 PM
The main reason there has been a spat of Superhero movies since 2000 (when x-men came out, pre 911, you may also want to count Blade which was what, 1998?), is that Marvel finally sorted out their licencing issues with the formation of Marvel Studios in 1996. Before that it was a mess.

With licensing sorted they started small with Blade, then hit the jackpot with Xmen and the first Spiderman (a movie that had been stuck in development, due to never ending licence issues for 25 years) which was filmed pre-911.

With the phenomenal success of these movies, the technology to now make them work, and 25years of fan frustration behind them, franchise after franchise followed suit. It was a formula, it worked, the end.

Remember, DC had no such licence issues and had been creating Superman (Reeve) and Batman (Burton et al) mvies for years, and succesful ones at that.

he is right about one thing though, no Brit would be seen dead in a cape unless for comic effect. Our idea of a superhero is Judge Dredd a leather clad psychopath who blows peoples heads of blam blam.
Reply to message
Interesting article on the American superhero - 07/06/2011 01:10:07 PM 643 Views
Nice theory, however... - 07/06/2011 01:42:30 PM 426 Views
You mean you don't run around in a cape and tights? - 07/06/2011 01:49:21 PM 401 Views
I agree the theories are nice but the support for them is weak - 07/06/2011 06:49:36 PM 559 Views

Reply to Message