Active Users:718 Time:05/08/2025 11:00:07 PM
Nice theories *NM* Sidious Send a noteboard - 26/08/2011 08:26:20 AM
If Tarkin had deciced to take the Death Star to say the capital and try to blow up the Emperor the officers may have gone along with it but that's when Vader's role would have kicked in and no more Tarkin.


Yes. If you think about it, their command functions more closely resemble that of a Soviet commanding officer (Tarkin) and a commissar or political officer (Vader). Also, I maintain that the "weak point" in the original Death Star served a similar purpose, especially for the scenario you describe. From the attitudes of the Death Star's command staff, deciding that as the men who control "the Ultimate Power in the Universe", THEY should be running the Empire and not the geezer in the bathrobe, whose only claim to rule (now that he has undermined his Senate-granted authority by disbanding said Senate) is his theoretical possession of a power they do not even believe in. From there, it is a matter of flying the Death Star to Coruscant and ordering the administration to ignore bathrobe-boy if they don't want to get blown up. The hole you could blow up the Death Star by shooting, was claimed by the actual pilot to be an impossible-to-hit shot and only the guy who had never flown an X-wing disagreed with him. We later see that the leader of the team tasked with hitting the weak spot fails to make his shot. When Luke is going for it, ObiWan comes back from the grave to tell him to switch off the computer and use the Force, which Luke has never done in his life, in a life-or-death situation. Plainly the Force was required or the computer would have been a better bet. Otherwise, it looks like Obi-Wan is endangering the mission and the survival of the entire rebellion just to get Luke some more practice.

Therefore, if the weak spot was made so that only the Force could hit it, it seems highly likely that the Emperor or Vader had it deliberately installed as a fail-safe just in case their Force-agnostic military command (and you don't put anyone but your most trusted and loyal commanders in charge of weapons like a Death Star) decides to turn their toy against the Sith Lords. TIE fighters are supposedly short-range fighters that could not be out in space alone, but Vader has a special one that allows him to get back to the Imperial Fleet or territory after the Death Star blows. Why give him such a fighter based out of an "indestructible" battle station? Unless the plan was for him to use it if he had to destroy the Death Star...

Also note how Vader takes the threat of the rebel fighters seriously, while Tarkin scoffs at the possibility of them doing any harm. Almost like he knew they could do it, but Tarkin was kept in the dark.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
This message last edited by Sidious on 26/08/2011 at 08:26:37 AM
Reply to message
Star Wars: The Prequels Strike Back - 23/08/2011 05:22:54 PM 1741 Views
Heh, Anakin = Mark Zuckerberg *NM* - 23/08/2011 05:53:16 PM 521 Views
The music - 23/08/2011 11:00:13 PM 882 Views
point 4 of the "bad things about the original movies" is kind of weak - 24/08/2011 01:07:01 AM 861 Views
They'll have to refer to these notes when they remake all of them in 10 years - 24/08/2011 04:31:39 AM 957 Views
Re: Vader and Tarkin - 24/08/2011 04:20:43 PM 1318 Views
I like that take. *NM* - 24/08/2011 05:18:21 PM 482 Views
That's kind of how I saw it. *NM* - 24/08/2011 11:00:32 PM 536 Views
Also, it makes the military guys feel better if they see the chain of command at work. - 25/08/2011 01:53:02 AM 1041 Views
On that last statement... - 25/08/2011 09:27:01 AM 878 Views
Yeah, I've seen that theory before - 25/08/2011 02:27:29 PM 894 Views
Yes - 25/08/2011 07:31:25 PM 882 Views
Nice theories *NM* - 26/08/2011 08:26:20 AM 1029 Views
Good stuff. And there are many more. I like the PT better than the OT. - 24/08/2011 07:48:19 PM 893 Views
I don't want to alarm you, but you might be a monster. - 24/08/2011 07:54:17 PM 847 Views
Most people I know under age 22 or so prefer the PT. *NM* - 24/08/2011 09:07:10 PM 494 Views
So the real question is ... - 24/08/2011 09:19:51 PM 960 Views
I'm 26, but it's pretty close. - 24/08/2011 11:46:39 PM 895 Views
No offense - 25/08/2011 12:10:17 AM 960 Views
I'm 38, and I do love the PT - 25/08/2011 12:45:11 AM 854 Views
I agreed with so much of what you said, then I cried. - 25/08/2011 01:39:45 AM 1006 Views
Traviss's Mandalorian fan-fiction makes Kevin J Anderson almost tolerable by comparison - 25/08/2011 02:11:41 AM 1089 Views
Ugh Zahn was so boring. *NM* - 25/08/2011 04:00:28 AM 479 Views
Four of his five books are among my favourite Star Wars entries. - 26/08/2011 01:42:29 PM 854 Views
I, too, loved the Thrawn trilogy *NM* - 26/08/2011 02:15:18 PM 426 Views
He actually wrote at least eight. - 12/09/2011 07:33:28 PM 881 Views
Thankyouverymuchindeed. - 24/08/2011 09:04:54 PM 884 Views
I'm not even going there. - 24/08/2011 09:26:11 PM 941 Views
my biggest complaint about the prequels is - 25/08/2011 12:48:13 AM 830 Views
I mostly agree - 25/08/2011 01:37:28 AM 1003 Views
I tend to consider the prequels to be inferior - 26/08/2011 08:41:46 AM 1141 Views
I still think that James Franco would have been awesome as Anakin - 26/08/2011 09:05:48 AM 1030 Views
I'd never really thought about it before, but I agree! *NM* - 26/08/2011 02:22:00 PM 537 Views
I'd have to agree as well *NM* - 28/08/2011 12:01:18 AM 520 Views
I've said that before. And they look almost exactly the same. *NM* - 28/08/2011 12:26:29 AM 626 Views
except, imo, Franco looks like a MAN *NM* - 28/08/2011 08:01:03 AM 579 Views
Re: I tend to consider the prequels to be inferior - 26/08/2011 10:26:15 PM 1202 Views
Re: I tend to consider the prequels to be inferior - 27/08/2011 08:25:45 AM 947 Views
It's the Force, stupid. - 25/08/2011 02:46:38 AM 1196 Views
Woah, woah. - 25/08/2011 03:26:02 AM 891 Views
Oops. Sorry. Will fix soonest. - 25/08/2011 07:32:37 PM 1005 Views
I still remember how much I adored Episode I - 25/08/2011 08:05:02 PM 1071 Views
The one thing about the PT that I could never get over is..... - 26/08/2011 05:24:12 AM 1158 Views
That issue is over four hundred years old. - 26/08/2011 06:09:37 PM 968 Views

Reply to Message