Active Users:265 Time:03/05/2024 11:41:27 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: For my part, what I hated most wasn't what they took out... Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 03/08/2012 06:17:43 AM
I actually think that the Elves at Helm's Deep worked a lot better than having some strange new humans (the Rangers were not established in the previous movie) showing up.


I'm pretty sure the Rangers don't show up until after Helm's Deep (The Passing of the Grey Company, in RotK), so that's a useless comparison. But even if this had been the case, removing something confusing does not warrant introducing something worthless in its stead. Replacing Erkenbrand with Éomer, for example, makes sense. Replacing Glorfindel with Arwen fills me with fanboy rage, but it is still understandable. The Elves at Helm's Deep were not. They contribute nothing, and take time away from things that could have been worthwhile.

It also put more emotional weight into the battle, as we saw beings who were essentially immortal being killed.


No, it really doesn't.

It also represented something that wasn't shown "on screen" in the books, the fact that the Elves were actually involving themselves in the war against Sauron. Without showing the Elves at Helm's Deep, non-book reading viewers would have assumed it was basically a human war. It wasn't.


This is the common excuse, and it is complete bullshit. In the books, the Dwarves of Erebor and the Iron Mountains also involve themselves in the war against Sauron, but nobody feels it necessary to include them in the Battle of Helm's Deep.

But more than that, when you choose to include the Last Alliance of Men and Elves you do not go "oh, but that was just a name!" and include another alliance of Men and Elves! And you do not get points because Haldir hangs a lampshade on it.

Daín Ironfoot is not impressed, and neither am I.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
So now there'll be THREE Hobbit movies. Stephen - 30/07/2012 07:40:26 PM 1476 Views
This has to be them trying to milk it. Fox and Ravens - 30/07/2012 07:56:26 PM 746 Views
Re: This has to be them trying to milk it. imlad - 30/07/2012 08:56:39 PM 741 Views
There's not a lot in the appendices. Werthead - 30/07/2012 09:31:11 PM 768 Views
Bad news for you - all 3 movies will be the story of the Hobbit..... Anonymous2000 - 31/07/2012 12:27:51 AM 687 Views
That would be my guess. Nate - 31/07/2012 01:25:07 AM 777 Views
Re: That would be my guess. DomA - 31/07/2012 04:27:48 PM 721 Views
So what you're saying is ... Nate - 31/07/2012 04:47:22 PM 705 Views
Re: So what you're saying is ... DomA - 01/08/2012 10:01:50 PM 746 Views
You didn't get the joke. Nate - 01/08/2012 10:54:06 PM 730 Views
That is bullshit of the highest caliber and you know it. Stephen - 31/07/2012 12:37:37 AM 677 Views
Are you really going to skip out on a 3rd movie? Dark Knight - 31/07/2012 03:15:54 AM 720 Views
Heh. I wasn't even aware that they were going to make two. Fanatic-Templar - 30/07/2012 09:13:44 PM 662 Views
*sniff* I smell cash grab. *NM* Jeordam - 30/07/2012 09:04:50 PM 353 Views
And the worst part is... Tigr - 30/07/2012 10:21:07 PM 729 Views
No. Sareitha Sedai - 02/08/2012 05:50:00 PM 706 Views
LOL, gotta love that Liv Tyler. Tigr - 02/08/2012 06:40:38 PM 720 Views
I'm surprised they can speak with their mouths stuck in the cash trough Wibble - 30/07/2012 10:21:45 PM 713 Views
Erm. Yeah, that doesn't sound like the best ever plan to me, either. Legolas - 30/07/2012 11:28:24 PM 696 Views
I don't understand the whole cash grab thing everybody is talking about Dark Knight - 31/07/2012 03:11:46 AM 660 Views
if they are sick of money-grubbing filmmakers imlad - 31/07/2012 09:43:39 PM 664 Views
I ain't skipping it. nossy - 31/07/2012 02:43:05 PM 666 Views
As long as they're good, more power to the director. jh - 31/07/2012 04:13:00 PM 720 Views
Peter Jackson hates me Camilla - 01/08/2012 11:12:02 AM 911 Views
The LOTR trilogy was amazing! Right? Anonymous2000 - 01/08/2012 11:48:59 PM 677 Views
For my part, what I hated most wasn't what they took out... Fanatic-Templar - 02/08/2012 04:29:56 AM 728 Views
YES! Camilla - 02/08/2012 07:42:54 AM 867 Views
Re: For my part, what I hated most wasn't what they took out... nossy - 02/08/2012 02:38:18 PM 648 Views
Re: For my part, what I hated most wasn't what they took out... imlad - 02/08/2012 07:05:28 PM 669 Views
It's a fair point, but it was really the wrong battle to put them in. Legolas - 02/08/2012 09:35:47 PM 640 Views
Re: For my part, what I hated most wasn't what they took out... Fanatic-Templar - 03/08/2012 06:17:43 AM 652 Views
Damn, fanboys sure are defensive Dark Knight - 03/08/2012 06:54:39 PM 702 Views
Don't do that. He has the right. nossy - 03/08/2012 07:15:15 PM 656 Views
Of course they do, otherwise they wouldn't be fanboys. Fanatic-Templar - 04/08/2012 06:00:40 AM 672 Views
Here's what probably will be added ironclad - 02/08/2012 08:32:40 PM 915 Views
Sound very good indeed! Thanks for the link! *NM* Anonymous2000 - 04/08/2012 08:25:31 PM 323 Views
That sounds awesome. I can't wait for all 3 films. *NM* Aeryn - 10/09/2012 08:29:47 PM 427 Views
Now we know the titles and release dates ironclad - 01/09/2012 11:00:22 AM 737 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes