Active Users:419 Time:24/03/2026 07:41:13 PM
Well, yeah. nossy Send a noteboard - 22/09/2012 03:12:34 PM
So what, Galadriel, Elrond, and the Wizards all form separate groups that go on separate adventures to physically battle evil and not just stand around in a montage and/or stretched out dialogues? I hope you're right. :/

Isn't there supposed to be a secondary plot line with the whole necromancer thing? I mean, of course there will be talking, but why else would we be hearing so much about those characters? And then we have Thranduil's elves, and for all we know, we might get flashbacks into Smaug's history, etc. I'm sure there will be plenty of dwarvish antics, but I don't think they will have trouble breaking it up.
Reply to message
Hobbit pictures - 18/09/2012 08:23:21 AM 1163 Views
I mostly stay away from them at this point - 18/09/2012 11:59:54 AM 773 Views
I can't help but feel a slight dread for Radagast being included. - 20/09/2012 07:55:08 PM 943 Views
Radagast should be the least of your worries. - 21/09/2012 06:41:40 AM 786 Views
To both of you: I knew about the three movie thing and that's bad. - 21/09/2012 07:01:47 AM 1016 Views
Um. - 21/09/2012 03:33:29 PM 721 Views
err - 21/09/2012 06:37:26 PM 708 Views
Well, yeah. - 22/09/2012 03:12:34 PM 755 Views
Gandalf's role - 22/09/2012 03:44:23 PM 956 Views
Re: Gandalf's role - 22/09/2012 03:53:02 PM 707 Views
Jens linked this previously: - 22/09/2012 04:03:40 PM 782 Views

Reply to Message