Active Users:915 Time:28/07/2026 04:20:00 AM
Well, yeah. nossy Send a noteboard - 22/09/2012 03:12:34 PM
So what, Galadriel, Elrond, and the Wizards all form separate groups that go on separate adventures to physically battle evil and not just stand around in a montage and/or stretched out dialogues? I hope you're right. :/

Isn't there supposed to be a secondary plot line with the whole necromancer thing? I mean, of course there will be talking, but why else would we be hearing so much about those characters? And then we have Thranduil's elves, and for all we know, we might get flashbacks into Smaug's history, etc. I'm sure there will be plenty of dwarvish antics, but I don't think they will have trouble breaking it up.
Reply to message
Hobbit pictures - 18/09/2012 08:23:21 AM 1212 Views
I mostly stay away from them at this point - 18/09/2012 11:59:54 AM 821 Views
I can't help but feel a slight dread for Radagast being included. - 20/09/2012 07:55:08 PM 998 Views
Radagast should be the least of your worries. - 21/09/2012 06:41:40 AM 827 Views
To both of you: I knew about the three movie thing and that's bad. - 21/09/2012 07:01:47 AM 1074 Views
Um. - 21/09/2012 03:33:29 PM 760 Views
err - 21/09/2012 06:37:26 PM 764 Views
Well, yeah. - 22/09/2012 03:12:34 PM 804 Views
Gandalf's role - 22/09/2012 03:44:23 PM 1013 Views
Re: Gandalf's role - 22/09/2012 03:53:02 PM 759 Views
Jens linked this previously: - 22/09/2012 04:03:40 PM 835 Views

Reply to Message