Active Users:299 Time:02/05/2024 06:18:15 PM
Re: That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. DomA Send a noteboard - 19/10/2012 03:46:33 PM
That, and transforming Lucas into some kind of visonary driving force behind ILM, as if Lucas was behind the invention of special FX driven movies, for the big turns the FX industry took, or personally responsible for the technical innovations (he's little more responsible for pushing ILM's limits than the rooster of directors ILM worked for over the years, key ones including Ridley Scott, Cameron). Ironically, Lucas has held back ILM several times (most notably by forcing them to abandon extremely innovative forays into computer generated FX. Lucas pulled the plug on that and sold their first computer division to Steve Jobs. According to Lucas, miniatures and models were the way to go and CGI was for animation, computers wouldn't be used on a large scale for live-action movies' FX for maybe decades... Oops.. a few years later, ILM had to buy licenses to innovative tools developped by other companies and hire people who worked there to catch up before emerging smaller companies, for example Cameron's, took a lead, eventually closing their outdated practical FX divisions by the time Lucas finished using their services for his prequels)

It's mostly in terms of aesthetics that Star Wars was a landmark. Lucas and his art directors reinvented how spaceships and robots ought to look like. That was influential, though the guy most directly influenced by this (Ridley Scott) soon became even more influential in this respect (with the art direction of Alien and Blade Runner).

At the time Lucas made ANH, Hollywood was already sitting on tons of projects for SFX heavy movies. The economy and the turn the American directors had taken (toward a darker, more European influenced cinema and smaller scale productions) in that decade had slowed down the expected arrival of "space conquest" influenced entertainment cinema.

By hiring the top crafstmen in each craft of SFX and stacking them in a garage as a company, Lucas was able to make ANH with shoe-strings. It's not the movie as such but its success (combined with that of CEOTTK by Spielberg) that convinced Hollywood to greenlit several projects on hold. But Lucas didn't exist in a vaccuum, and unlike several others of his generation who were dreaming to return to big productions, for Lucas SW was just a little trip for nostalgia's sake to the movies of Harryhausen, the serials like Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers. He was one of the young directors most influenced by Europe, Truffault and Tarkovsky and so on. And Kurosawa whom he idolized. He was foreseeing a career as a director of critically acclaimed obscure movies... so much for that, he just didn't have the talent for it, and he couldn't direct actors if his life depended on it.

There were other directors/producers far more important than Lucas in the big return to big productions, among them Coppola, Spielberg and Ridley Scott.
Reply to message
When the career of George Lucas is reviewed, will he be the most influential film-maker of all time? - 10/10/2012 12:27:59 AM 971 Views
ont forget THX and Skywalker Sound. *NM* - 10/10/2012 04:02:18 AM 307 Views
Absolutely, right. - 10/10/2012 08:11:54 AM 677 Views
Shrug. He might be the most influential special-effects artist *NM* - 10/10/2012 08:43:05 AM 307 Views
Hardly, he's not even one... *NM* - 12/10/2012 01:21:18 AM 274 Views
It is going to be the same way with Steve Jobs - 10/10/2012 02:38:25 PM 596 Views
Steve Jobs shouldn't be remembered for the Apple II, it was Woz's creation. - 18/10/2012 04:37:38 AM 529 Views
He deserves all the credit he gets, he's a superior artist to his pals Spielberg & Coppola - 10/10/2012 04:15:29 PM 720 Views
Hell has frozen over - 11/10/2012 04:31:56 PM 600 Views
I'm going to start making a list of people who say stuff like this to me. - 12/10/2012 03:48:36 AM 642 Views
well, I always point it out when it happens to me - 12/10/2012 08:24:44 PM 621 Views
acting does matter for opera though ... - 23/10/2012 07:57:56 AM 778 Views
That's giving a single man way too much credit and influence, and under the wrong title - 12/10/2012 01:13:07 AM 566 Views
Pretty sure I said film-maker. (Checks the Subject line.) Yep, I did. *NM* - 15/10/2012 05:28:50 AM 304 Views
That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. *NM* - 18/10/2012 10:31:26 PM 270 Views
Re: That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. - 19/10/2012 03:46:33 PM 584 Views
this is not in response to DomA's comment, but - 19/10/2012 08:31:23 PM 609 Views
I've seen parts of that. It's a good one. *NM* - 22/10/2012 08:49:47 AM 271 Views
I agree 100%. *NM* - 18/10/2012 10:29:40 PM 277 Views
Short answer, no. - 15/10/2012 06:19:52 PM 662 Views
Absolutely not. - 18/10/2012 10:19:20 PM 723 Views

Reply to Message