Active Users:196 Time:08/05/2024 08:39:03 AM
Neither you nor the blogger know anything about old submarines Cannoli Send a noteboard - 30/09/2009 12:42:20 AM
I did wonder about the submerged sub. I don't agree with you on this point, It's obvious that a German sub would submerge while sailing the Pacific during WW2.


First of all, the movie is set in the late thirties, well before WW2 broke out, so there would not be any problem with German submarines going whereever they wanted. Second of all, submarines in those days did not travel underwater. They were not yet nuclear-powered, and so it cost more power and they could not move as fast while they were submerged (for example, a Type VII U-boat [wihch was staet of the art in 1936] could only make about 7-8 knots while submerged, compared to over 17 knots on the surface), AND they could not stay down for nearly as long. Submarines submerged like soldiers crawled on their bellies - when there was enemy activity nearby. No way a submarine COULD or even WOULD travel submerged the distances shown on the map in 1936/37. They only dove to avoid being spotted when they KNEW something hostile was nearby.

If they wanted to nit-pick about military hardware, there is the dubious issue of sending a sub to pursue a surface vessel, as many ships could outrun even the best submarines in the 30s(though they might have simply radioed ahead to have a sub in the area intercept it). Or they could bring up the rocket launcher Indy points at the Ark. The first rocket launchers like that were invented by the US and only deployed after we joined the war in 1941, and the Germans only built their version (the panzershrek) after capturing American models to reverse-engineer is Russia, which, again, they did not invade until 1941. So there would not have been a bazooka or panzershrek for Indy to threaten the Ark with in 1936 or whenever the movie was set. Also, I suspect the gun that Indy used to shoot the guards who entered his father's room (before saying "Don't call me Junior" ) in the third film was a MP-40, which, as the name implies, was not available in the 30s. There were German predecessors to that weapon, though I am not confident of a visual identification.

I would add that the screenwriter or director knew this to be a plot hole else he wouldn't have escaped to the traveling map.
By this standard, planes can't REALLY fly either, since they cut to the map for that too.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Cannoli on 30/09/2009 at 12:48:38 AM
Reply to message
Top 10 unanswered Questions in Geeky Movies - 29/09/2009 05:39:22 PM 1241 Views
Another one with the Death Star attack - 29/09/2009 06:53:56 PM 508 Views
Re: Another one with the Death Star attack - 29/09/2009 08:00:23 PM 622 Views
Some of these are kind of lame. - 29/09/2009 07:47:01 PM 543 Views
They do address the midnight thing in Gremlins 2 - 30/09/2009 12:16:33 AM 529 Views
Neither you nor the blogger know anything about old submarines - 30/09/2009 12:42:20 AM 523 Views
I have to agree with you about Back to the Future... - 30/09/2009 01:47:04 AM 459 Views
I agree with these... - 30/09/2009 09:56:30 AM 615 Views
How I PITY people who watch films that way - 29/09/2009 08:27:58 PM 565 Views
Or in other words... - 30/09/2009 02:53:00 AM 510 Views
Oh, c'mon, it's fun. - 05/10/2009 01:42:56 AM 505 Views
Gremlins - 29/09/2009 09:17:38 PM 577 Views
Also on the subject of the Death Star.. - 01/10/2009 08:02:47 PM 673 Views
Re: Top 10 unanswered Questions in Geeky Movies - 17/10/2009 02:28:28 AM 551 Views

Reply to Message