Active Users:178 Time:18/05/2024 04:42:09 PM
Not as bad as you made it sound, but not great either. *no spoilers* ironclad Send a noteboard - 21/05/2014 09:34:41 AM

There is a long history of monster movies taking their time to reveal the monster, and usually that's a great decision. The hints of terror and the viewer's mind filling in the gaps is a very powerful tool. There is little of that in Godzilla's first act, though. It takes its time to introduce the main characters. Sadly, they still remain somewhat flat and acting giants like Bryan Cranston remain underused.

But people watch this for the monster and destruction, right? Director Gareth Edwards decides to stick to the approach he used in his critically acclaimed "Monsters" or fellow films like "Cloverfield": if the (human) protagonists can't see it, then neither can the audience. That makes for both wonderfully eerie and incredibly frustrating scenes. Visually very impressive ones, mind you. Only the showdown actually delivers what you paid to see but can't shake off the feeling that Godzilla just happened to get a supporting role in its own film.

The movie is already a success after its first week but I am curious how people will actually react to it. It's the "Skyfall" of Godzilla films: really well done, approaching the old tale in a dead serious and supposedly realistic way but somehow forgetting to have fun on the way.

The result is entertaining enough after the slow intro, and the effects breath-taking, but I am not entirely sure this is actually what people had hoped for.

*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Reply to message
Godzilla (2014) - 16/05/2014 01:14:47 AM 643 Views
But aren't all Godizlla movies awful? - 17/05/2014 03:21:04 AM 410 Views
Re: But aren't all Godizlla movies awful? - 19/05/2014 01:40:44 AM 470 Views
Not as bad as you made it sound, but not great either. *no spoilers* - 21/05/2014 09:34:41 AM 371 Views

Reply to Message