Active Users:306 Time:14/05/2024 01:38:51 PM
Is it lazier than "that's sad" or "shame to hear that"? Legolas Send a noteboard - 12/06/2015 08:23:38 PM

View original postTyping the abbreviation is lazy because you could write out the short words in English or Latin (rest in peace/requiescat in pace). But it's intellectually lazy because it says nothing original about the person who died.

I didn't and don't pretend to have anything particularly original to say about Christopher Lee or his death, no. As for writing out the short words, yes, I could've done... not sure what difference it makes? It wouldn't have added anything more original, either.
Reply to message
I think Christopher Lee is dead - 11/06/2015 05:26:38 PM 704 Views
On what are you basing this assumption? - 11/06/2015 05:45:07 PM 415 Views
He didn't move when I poked him? *NM* - 25/06/2015 11:27:28 PM 263 Views
Did you try shouting in his ear? *NM* - 26/06/2015 04:33:11 AM 238 Views
So he is. RIP - not many actors have a career that long. - 11/06/2015 06:56:16 PM 1311 Views
Thanks for the link - 11/06/2015 09:33:52 PM 427 Views
What's with fucking RIP? It's so damn lazy on all levels. - 12/06/2015 12:36:43 AM 426 Views
Is it lazier than "that's sad" or "shame to hear that"? - 12/06/2015 08:23:38 PM 452 Views
Yes. It is. It's just an abbreviation. - 13/06/2015 04:58:51 AM 449 Views
Indeed. May he rest in peace. *NM* - 13/06/2015 07:36:42 AM 291 Views

Reply to Message