Active Users:629 Time:17/03/2026 03:56:29 PM
Well tbh it's ratings sucked Wibble Send a noteboard - 13/11/2009 12:12:38 AM

As for no one watching his shows, he may not have the highest ratings on the initial airing, but having a loyal fanbase in the US and abroad that will buy the DVDs if they can't see it on television (or even if they can) should count for something, you'd think.


I mean I mentioned Buffy due to it's relative success and spin off on culture. But in reality it's viewing figures sucked in comparison to the big networks. It average 4-5.5M which wasn't even the biggest show on the WB, never mind in comparison to big shows on the main networks. Whedon has actually never really had much of an audience volume wise.

Yes that audience is stupidly loyal and will create revenue via related sales. And it can also be an attractive audience for advertisers if they are sure they are hitting the key 18-35 demographic. But for a big network to limp along with those kind of viewing figures...just ain't gonna happen. The WB could carry those kind of numbers, but Fox can't, it expects nay demands more.

And yet they keep trying because they know Whedon has a rabidly loyal audience out there, and they must be scratching their heads as to why that cannot be turned into mainstream viewing. Also whilst DVD sales etc are all well and nice, it's risky pumping multi-millions into a TV series when you don't know that is going to happen, and even if it does it's not going to arrive for a while which cripples your cashflow. Adverts are a much safer bet and they come via numbers and demographic.
Reply to message
Dollhouse axed - 11/11/2009 11:19:05 PM 1261 Views
Shitty but unsurprising - 11/11/2009 11:30:18 PM 643 Views
One really has to wonder... - 12/11/2009 12:08:00 AM 724 Views
Especially when they made promises to him and he thought he was more prepared for FOX. *NM* - 12/11/2009 12:23:26 AM 320 Views
I am actually surprised that it got a second season... - 12/11/2009 01:52:03 AM 696 Views
I think Fox did try harder this time. - 12/11/2009 02:03:48 AM 736 Views
Re: Good dialogue and weeping heroines can only get you so far. *NM* - 12/11/2009 09:55:41 AM 333 Views
Seinfeld was on for YEARS, and it is quite literally a show about nothing. - 12/11/2009 02:36:08 PM 664 Views
Re: Very few weeping heroines on that one. *NM* - 12/11/2009 02:50:06 PM 286 Views
George. *NM* - 12/11/2009 08:02:09 PM 293 Views
- 12/11/2009 02:54:53 PM 600 Views
Have you seen the reunion on CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM? - 13/11/2009 02:21:53 AM 643 Views
What's wrong with weeping heroines? - 12/11/2009 04:46:53 PM 612 Views
That's simple... - 12/11/2009 07:37:02 PM 740 Views
Then how do you explain the initial axing of Buffy? - 12/11/2009 10:01:22 PM 664 Views
Well tbh it's ratings sucked - 13/11/2009 12:12:38 AM 717 Views
Fox would probably have been happy with another FIREFLY, actually. - 13/11/2009 02:25:40 AM 700 Views
Coming here must distort things as well - 13/11/2009 01:32:06 PM 599 Views
technically Dollhouse being on Fox is Eliza's fault - 12/11/2009 09:01:55 PM 630 Views
Summer Glau didn't even get a chance to be on it before it died. Her tally rises. - 12/11/2009 12:21:52 AM 690 Views
They're still airing the whole season, incidentally. *NM* - 12/11/2009 12:59:53 AM 272 Views
She also was on The Unit. - 12/11/2009 03:42:28 PM 626 Views
She was on my Unit once, too. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:48:24 PM 309 Views
And then you woke up. *NM* - 12/11/2009 07:40:25 PM 295 Views
Yeah, but it's a pretty crappy show. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:04:58 AM 320 Views
Maybe Whedon will learn to write a coherent narrative now. - 12/11/2009 01:44:08 AM 610 Views
To be fair, his Alpha got a more regular gig opportunity. *NM* - 12/11/2009 02:26:03 AM 337 Views
Re: YES! *NM* - 12/11/2009 09:54:53 AM 373 Views
Not surprising at all. - 12/11/2009 02:38:16 AM 658 Views
I hate when they do that. - 12/11/2009 06:29:38 AM 610 Views
Wednesdays always used to be packed. Now it's Thursdays and Fridays. *NM* - 12/11/2009 09:19:31 PM 344 Views
Yeah, saw that. - 12/11/2009 05:21:27 AM 625 Views
Definitely not. - 12/11/2009 03:44:02 PM 574 Views
Oh no!!! - 12/11/2009 06:22:16 AM 605 Views
This was pretty much expected - 12/11/2009 07:39:01 AM 656 Views
- 12/11/2009 09:05:35 PM 608 Views
I'd say it's probably well deserved. - 12/11/2009 11:38:33 PM 642 Views

Reply to Message