Active Users:493 Time:02/05/2025 03:13:11 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Not enough to be the nominally top-grossing movie. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 25/01/2010 08:39:57 AM
Of course, the runners up aren't masterworks of cinema either.

Also, virtually any measurement of money that doesn't adjust for inflation isn't worth the paper it's printed on.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Avatar - Highest Grossing Film of All-Time trzaska2000 - 25/01/2010 04:15:51 AM 926 Views
Re: Avatar - Highest Grossing Film of All-Time Tweak - 25/01/2010 04:23:14 AM 521 Views
Serious comment, or an exaggerated joke about Avatar's ridiculous budget? Aemon - 25/01/2010 07:49:28 AM 542 Views
I would be interested to know MightyYT - 25/01/2010 08:36:49 AM 534 Views
They might for someone who made Titanic. Aemon - 25/01/2010 02:05:08 PM 480 Views
Didn't he also shell out a hundred mil or more for advertising? Was that included in the amount? *NM* MightyYT - 25/01/2010 05:47:24 PM 224 Views
He did, I believe. Darth_Katie - 25/01/2010 03:15:46 PM 485 Views
Bit of both I guess, lol Tweak - 25/01/2010 05:38:15 PM 557 Views
Re: Bit of both I guess, lol Aemon - 25/01/2010 06:13:04 PM 537 Views
From my understanding about a third of its cost was also marketing. *NM* Roland00 - 26/01/2010 12:15:18 AM 223 Views
Not this good, but it's alright. Worth watching I guess. *NM* Gher - 25/01/2010 04:30:58 AM 223 Views
I'm looking forward to see what Cameron does next. Aemon - 25/01/2010 07:54:54 AM 497 Views
Not enough to be the nominally top-grossing movie. Ghavrel - 25/01/2010 08:39:57 AM 580 Views
only because ticket prices are so high *NM* Beqi - 25/01/2010 09:25:07 AM 214 Views
Yeah. Inflation always bugs me w/ breaking these records. *NM* Zalis - 25/01/2010 02:51:31 PM 221 Views
Especially with so many people seeing it in IMAX. Those tickets generally cost $5 or so more. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 26/01/2010 09:26:42 PM 234 Views
It's a very enjoyable movie...but yes, probably not really worth THAT much *NM* LadyLorraine - 25/01/2010 12:07:37 PM 205 Views
I did not expect it to make it ironclad - 25/01/2010 12:28:03 PM 515 Views
Worth seeing on the big screen. Just don't expect Citizen Kane. *NM* PhotoJim - 25/01/2010 01:12:46 PM 220 Views
No. It's not good at all. It's an 'experience'. That aside it's distinctly average. *NM* Wibble - 25/01/2010 01:24:06 PM 219 Views
I loved it. Alfheim - 25/01/2010 02:26:20 PM 636 Views
I would still expect him to like it. Aemon - 25/01/2010 06:38:48 PM 536 Views
people say that about Titanic, but I haven' seen it LadyLorraine - 25/01/2010 07:18:38 PM 497 Views
Technically, that's supposed to be Gone with the Wind Chas - 25/01/2010 11:54:55 PM 553 Views
I just had the mental image of gone with the wind in 3-D LadyLorraine - 26/01/2010 01:54:05 AM 476 Views
The burning of Atlanta was really impressive in 3D *NM* Michael - 26/01/2010 10:29:34 AM 224 Views
Yes. AVATAR is only 26th on the adjusted list. Werthead - 26/01/2010 06:56:17 PM 577 Views
Re: Yes. AVATAR is only 26th on the adjusted list. TaskmasterJack - 26/01/2010 10:48:00 PM 476 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes