Active Users:698 Time:13/03/2026 02:13:53 AM
Great episode! Sir Tybalt Send a noteboard - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM
I missed the first couple of seconds of the show, but they were showing us pictures of Jack - was there a woman in there somewhere? Possibly the mother of Jack's son?

Sounds like Jacob knew Jack would trash the lighthouse all along. He's just nudging Jack along the path he needs to take.

Soooo, what happens now when Kate finds Claire and tells her she had Aaron this whole time? So long, Kate?

Can't wait for next week's episode!
Reply to message
Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 12:58:58 PM 905 Views
Great episode! - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM 565 Views
Re: Great episode! - 24/02/2010 03:45:55 PM 552 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 03:59:28 PM 635 Views
This episode was very subtle.... - 24/02/2010 04:06:28 PM 648 Views
I checked for the tattoo - 24/02/2010 07:55:48 PM 551 Views
Re Kate and Aaron - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM 584 Views
So what's up with next week's episode? - 24/02/2010 05:00:45 PM 608 Views
You know I really love this show but... - 25/02/2010 12:20:36 AM 566 Views
That actually was kinda (unintentionally) funny. *NM* - 26/02/2010 05:58:03 PM 209 Views
I wouldn't call Claire the new Rousseau. They're actually opposite. - 25/02/2010 12:27:19 AM 620 Views
Agreed - 25/02/2010 03:16:11 AM 542 Views
Christian and Locke. - 25/02/2010 10:54:30 AM 504 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 03:23:47 AM 557 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 12:20:53 PM 592 Views
Kate Austen was on the lighthouse dial as number 51, not crossed off. - 25/02/2010 12:45:15 PM 529 Views
Other numbers: - 26/02/2010 11:49:33 PM 526 Views
Interesting that name 108 on the dial is Wallace. Possibly a shoutout to David Wallace? - 26/02/2010 12:22:26 AM 528 Views
Could be. Are the writers fans of The Office? - 26/02/2010 03:24:53 PM 526 Views
Without reading dial, I thought it might be Walt. - 04/03/2010 06:11:04 PM 518 Views
Haha, the funnyiest thing for me is... - 27/02/2010 01:53:06 PM 542 Views
A question not addressed.... - 27/02/2010 03:26:29 PM 605 Views
Nope - 27/02/2010 03:33:45 PM 589 Views

Reply to Message