Active Users:459 Time:03/05/2025 01:21:33 AM
I thought they served a purpose in Ebu Dar djwilson300 Send a noteboard - 03/06/2010 11:16:49 PM
The windfinders played a significant role both in exposing what life for the mainlander channelers would be like chained, and creating a valid diversion for the entire Matt vs Tuon thread. I think the entire "bargain" turned out to be a fizzled plotline when the net result was spoiled food for the Domani and not much else. I can only hope when the last battle begins, the Sea Folk are called upon again to do something more productive. (Whats not to like about them...topless graceful women who have the best balance of power with the opposite sex than any other culture in the world...sign me up)
Reply to message
Are the Sea Folk important? - 03/06/2010 04:35:17 PM 1106 Views
Double post - Ignore *NM* - 03/06/2010 08:13:43 PM 261 Views
Re: Are the Sea Folk important? - 03/06/2010 08:13:43 PM 776 Views
I thought they served a purpose in Ebu Dar - 03/06/2010 11:16:49 PM 800 Views
Oh right, the Amayar thing... hope Sanderson's careful about stuff like that. - 04/06/2010 01:41:53 AM 732 Views
Agreed - 04/06/2010 04:39:08 AM 649 Views
Oceanic shadowspawn - 04/06/2010 01:44:51 PM 712 Views
Re: Agreed - 04/06/2010 05:26:21 PM 606 Views
yes, actually that makes sense - 04/06/2010 09:43:45 PM 567 Views
Not as important as your mom is to me. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:20:03 AM 363 Views
Not as important as your mom is to me. Oops, Double post. MY BAD. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:20:04 AM 243 Views
Is it just me or did a bunch of double posts go missing? - 04/06/2010 10:50:09 PM 520 Views
Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 04/06/2010 03:11:19 PM 589 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 04/06/2010 04:51:24 PM 808 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 04/06/2010 06:58:05 PM 589 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 05/06/2010 04:53:27 AM 586 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 05/06/2010 05:53:43 AM 543 Views
Seanchan transport numbers - 05/06/2010 08:58:31 AM 541 Views

Reply to Message