Active Users:327 Time:26/06/2025 01:21:15 PM
Implausible newyorkersedai Send a noteboard - 10/06/2010 02:50:51 PM
I simply refuse to believe that a Forsaken like Arangar spends *all* of her time attending to Egwene. Even including meetings with her BA lackey, Delana is probably quite busy, so Arangar should have a good 19-22 hours in a day for whatever things she wants to do herself. Unlike Semi in Seanchan territory, no one could detect Arangar, so she could just come and go as she chose. Seriously, she would only have had stuff to do for like 4-5 hours in a day, tops.

I've never heard any power comparisons of Arangar or Taim. Taim is supposed to hold nearly as much as Rand, while Arangar was supposed to be quite strong in the AoL, but I heard no measure of him. There's that Angreal thing, though, and I believe RJ said that you could fool people as to how strong you actually are...

I do agree, though, that "impersonation of other FS" was what Arangar meant by "playing my own game." For my money, it was obviously Cyndane who sent those Trollocs...

Taim's special knowledge could easily be explained in the way you describe. But him calling them "so-called Aiel?" That's just too much, y'know? If we're going to be told that he picked up that phrase from his boss, and gets a hoot out of saying "let the lord of chaos rule," then that will be a real asinine move on the part of the authors.

I did not mean to toss my idea out as some certainty - I just mentioned I was working up a Taimangar theory. Working up means trying to find support for, which means that I've been going through the books to make sure it's not flat-out impossible. I'm not certain yet that the text doesn't rule it out, as it does with Moridin and Osangar...

That is even more unlikely than the idea that Moridin might pose as Taim (which is also clearly wrong, IMO).

Taim is the most time at the BT, while Aran'gar was sent by SH to the Rebel AS, where she stays the most time. Aran'gar simply can't be at two places at the same time. Also Aran'gar's PoV show that she is concerned with the Rebels above anything else. Furthermore, RJ's various comments on Taim make pretty clear that he is an individual character, not a Forsaken in disguise. Taim's special knowledge would be explained, if he was trained by Ishy some time ago. Besides, IIRC Taim is stronger in the OP than Aran'gar. Finally, with "playing at her own game" Aran'gar obviously implies that another Forsaken posed as Sammael. This means Aran'gar's game was as well to imitate another Forsaken, not Taim. It makes some sense that Aran'gar was actually the person who sent the DF Asha'man after Rand in WH in a Demandred-disguise.
Reply to message
Egwene's future - 08/06/2010 10:10:28 AM 1169 Views
The headsman's axe might also be merely metaphorical. *NM* - 08/06/2010 11:25:52 AM 171 Views
Yes, could be... - 08/06/2010 01:36:08 PM 345 Views
I've wondered if Egwene is "The Andoran Candidate" - 08/06/2010 04:07:18 PM 410 Views
I rather think Aran'gar was a failure... - 09/06/2010 10:56:42 AM 271 Views
Finally found a quote to redeem the Forsaken a bit - 09/06/2010 03:53:37 PM 264 Views
Yeah, it's a bit strange... - 09/06/2010 04:09:48 PM 251 Views
Agreed - 09/06/2010 04:26:27 PM 229 Views
I think the DO's power is generated off of Chaos - 10/06/2010 01:21:56 PM 218 Views
Re: Yeah, it's a bit strange... - 09/06/2010 07:15:41 PM 234 Views
That is obvious, but... - 09/06/2010 08:25:16 PM 203 Views
Re: That is obvious, but... - 10/06/2010 05:13:50 PM 340 Views
More thoughts in defense of this idea - 09/06/2010 10:30:14 PM 223 Views
I think Aran'gar rather planned... - 10/06/2010 08:37:35 AM 249 Views
Re: More thoughts in defense of this idea - 10/06/2010 01:26:54 PM 235 Views
Aran'gar certainly isn't Taim - 10/06/2010 02:15:40 PM 217 Views
It's not my theory... I do think it would be hilarious though - 10/06/2010 02:44:57 PM 236 Views
Implausible - 10/06/2010 02:50:51 PM 222 Views
I mean... - 10/06/2010 03:20:41 PM 193 Views
I still think yet another clue speaks loudly that Taim is a real Forsaken - 10/06/2010 04:04:06 PM 209 Views
RJ explained Taim's look at the beginning of LoC - 10/06/2010 04:25:54 PM 288 Views
Personally I think RJ was full of sh*t with that comment - 11/06/2010 01:20:25 PM 224 Views
Indeed - 12/06/2010 08:27:16 AM 227 Views
Exactly! - 12/06/2010 01:02:53 PM 217 Views
Re: I mean... - 11/06/2010 01:23:28 PM 189 Views
Re: Implausible - 10/06/2010 06:44:01 PM 249 Views
Mesaana's more likely. There just isn't enough time for it to be the Seanchan, imo *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:31:07 PM 106 Views
On the other hand, we know that Egwene has to meet Seanchan yet. *NM* - 09/06/2010 10:51:37 AM 105 Views
In book time, she'll probably be seeing Seta (and possibly Egeanin) in a couple hours - 09/06/2010 11:09:08 AM 234 Views
They are in Caemlyn now... - 09/06/2010 11:45:02 AM 275 Views
I didn't say it was important - 09/06/2010 11:56:44 AM 216 Views
I mean... - 09/06/2010 02:54:33 PM 270 Views
not going to happen - 09/06/2010 09:10:16 PM 235 Views
Well, I agree that Egwene won't die... - 09/06/2010 09:29:32 PM 239 Views
Ya, I could see that *NM* - 09/06/2010 09:50:58 PM 91 Views
well it could shut Romanda and Lelaine up - 10/06/2010 01:28:51 PM 234 Views
I agree,,, - 10/06/2010 06:17:59 PM 254 Views
Egwene's dreams are symbolic - 09/06/2010 01:05:24 AM 514 Views
one little caveat - 09/06/2010 01:16:09 AM 240 Views
But... - 09/06/2010 11:13:24 AM 211 Views
Re: But... - 09/06/2010 04:00:05 PM 228 Views
Yeah... - 09/06/2010 04:12:11 PM 229 Views
Some are more literal, while some are more symbolic - 09/06/2010 10:51:09 AM 227 Views
Re: Some are more literal, while some are more symbolic - 09/06/2010 06:54:14 PM 274 Views
As you said... - 09/06/2010 08:33:13 PM 196 Views
Re: As you said... - 10/06/2010 12:23:02 AM 240 Views
I disagree - 10/06/2010 08:25:13 AM 240 Views
Re: As you said... - 10/06/2010 09:45:05 PM 254 Views
Re: As you said... - 10/06/2010 08:32:12 PM 223 Views
Re: As you said... - 10/06/2010 09:14:25 PM 199 Views
Re: As you said... - 10/06/2010 11:40:52 PM 245 Views
So... - 11/06/2010 08:46:41 AM 246 Views
Re: So... - 11/06/2010 02:37:28 PM 218 Views
as I just noted above - 11/06/2010 03:26:21 PM 233 Views
Re: as I just noted above - 11/06/2010 05:00:23 PM 248 Views
Well - 13/06/2010 10:58:04 AM 192 Views
LOL - 11/06/2010 09:28:28 AM 170 Views
I agree - 11/06/2010 10:13:47 AM 225 Views
Re: I agree - 12/06/2010 08:31:04 AM 257 Views
"I think" - 12/06/2010 11:56:19 AM 168 Views
Nesta was impaled on a stake and her head put on a spike for rebellion - 10/06/2010 01:44:53 PM 289 Views
A new bit by BS - 22/06/2010 01:30:27 PM 241 Views

Reply to Message