Especially all of the chapters leading up to Rand's introduction. I really had no idea what to expect, but I nearly had to stop reading after the first 5-7 paragraphs just to let my mind take it in. My brain is screaming "that's not RJ" while my emotions are screaming "but it's WOT dammit".
I have a feeling that it will be very obvious which parts are significantly/soley BS and which RJ. I guess that will have to be OK.
As it is, I liked what I read once it got going, and I'm very happy that the story will be told.
Most of all (and I've said this before), I'm beyond happy that RJ was the one who completed the ending (and apparently a rather large part of it) of this story. I would take the ending in BS's prose just to have it, but it would never have felt right. That RJ completed it is gold IMO.
I have a feeling that it will be very obvious which parts are significantly/soley BS and which RJ. I guess that will have to be OK.
As it is, I liked what I read once it got going, and I'm very happy that the story will be told.
Most of all (and I've said this before), I'm beyond happy that RJ was the one who completed the ending (and apparently a rather large part of it) of this story. I would take the ending in BS's prose just to have it, but it would never have felt right. That RJ completed it is gold IMO.
I would slave, to pave the way, to sink your ship of fools.
This is not RJ's writing. (No Spoilers)
- 05/09/2009 03:46:26 AM
1784 Views
How long is it? I kinda wanna read it now, but I'm at work, so I'm not sure if I have time. *NM*
- 05/09/2009 03:55:02 AM
354 Views
Bah, so am I. 4.5 pages on Microsoft Word. Single space, no margin, Arial font, size 9.
- 05/09/2009 04:02:13 AM
765 Views
Yeah, it was actually a fairly quick read..no trouble at all reading it at work. *NM*
- 05/09/2009 05:00:17 AM
409 Views
It isn't supposed to be.
- 05/09/2009 04:08:46 AM
888 Views
Re: This is not RJ's writing. (No Spoilers)
- 05/09/2009 04:13:48 AM
920 Views
Absolutely not.
- 05/09/2009 04:18:51 AM
1208 Views
Re: Absolutely not.
- 05/09/2009 04:25:16 AM
984 Views
That's what I meant by absolutely not.
- 05/09/2009 04:31:26 AM
955 Views
Could it be rough draft that Sanderson kept, and Jordan never polished? *NM*
- 05/09/2009 05:14:59 AM
438 Views
I doubt it
- 05/09/2009 05:17:09 AM
1040 Views
Definitely Sanderson
- 05/09/2009 05:27:57 AM
1008 Views
Yeah, I just finished reading it....and it was pretty obvious that it wasn't RJ
- 05/09/2009 04:55:30 AM
795 Views
Re: Yeah, I just finished reading it....and it was pretty obvious that it wasn't RJ
- 05/09/2009 07:41:51 AM
684 Views
Becareful of what you wish for
- 05/09/2009 08:29:52 AM
822 Views
Agree fully. Art and paiting have rarely even been mentioned! It feels like a fan's writing...
- 05/09/2009 09:59:15 AM
908 Views
Are you pre-ordering the book?
- 05/09/2009 10:48:44 AM
792 Views
No. It was never meant to be, it never could be and Sanderson never pretended otherwise.
- 05/09/2009 07:40:37 PM
932 Views
It sounds more like Anderson than Jordan
- 05/09/2009 11:11:58 PM
993 Views
Re: It sounds more like Anderson than Jordan
- 06/09/2009 12:19:11 AM
998 Views
It isn't but I thought BS said he wasn't trying to be exactly like RJ
- 08/09/2009 08:12:24 PM
787 Views
The difference was a bit staggering
- 08/09/2009 08:23:15 PM
769 Views

*NM*