Active Users:532 Time:03/10/2025 08:43:59 PM
Yes, basically. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 16/07/2010 01:36:13 PM
Rand was more scary than any Forsaken had been because he wasn't a caricature as they are, and RJ seemed to be unable to show the level of depravity and villainy they had sunk to without injecting comedy into it. I think he assumed readers would be shocked and sickened by the imagery in Graendals' palace and etc. He was a bit prudish in that regard.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
RJ finally got a villain right, then killed him in the same book. - 15/07/2010 10:10:16 PM 1302 Views
Re: RJ finally got a villain right, then killed him in the same book. - 16/07/2010 03:01:30 AM 755 Views
Ehhh that's a cop-out. And not even totally accurate. - 16/07/2010 08:27:19 AM 598 Views
My view exactly. - 16/07/2010 08:42:47 AM 604 Views
I agree. *NM* - 16/07/2010 09:33:59 AM 188 Views
Yes, basically. - 16/07/2010 01:36:13 PM 532 Views
The Forsaken are not THE villain(s), they are cannon fodder! - 19/07/2010 04:16:04 AM 653 Views
And that's why they're crappy villains - 19/07/2010 07:24:05 AM 452 Views
Cannoli misses the point. The Forsaken are all villains. It is the Dark One that is the true evil - 19/07/2010 04:01:34 PM 550 Views
The Forsaken are henchmen. Like the eels in The Little Mermaid or the hyenas in The Lion King - 20/07/2010 03:14:37 AM 555 Views
Absolutely correct, but you miss the point. - 20/07/2010 02:48:22 PM 435 Views
Exactly. - 20/07/2010 04:08:22 PM 386 Views
My point is simply that you are mistaking their place in the hierarchy - 20/07/2010 11:46:52 PM 493 Views
No, I'm not. And you just proved that you missed the point. - 21/07/2010 03:10:04 PM 412 Views
No - 19/07/2010 08:01:03 PM 463 Views
I'll call your "no" and raise you a "WTH?" - 19/07/2010 08:44:19 PM 436 Views
I'll raise your WTH and give you a WTF - 19/07/2010 09:24:04 PM 506 Views
Re: I'll raise your WTH and give you a WTF - 20/07/2010 02:44:22 AM 551 Views

Reply to Message