Active Users:896 Time:13/10/2025 07:37:47 PM
In RJ's explanation... Etzel Send a noteboard - 21/07/2010 02:32:03 PM
About the whole balefire-transmigration issue - which RJ explains in pretty detailed words - he never mentions or indicates that distance to SG plays any role. If that would play a role, it's not understandable why RJ didn't mention it in this context, because that wouldn't give anything away. He just says (and this was new information, not revealed in the books) that if a very small amount is used, the DO can theoretically still transmigrate someone. If one reads this answer one has to assume that distance to SG doesn't play any role but just the amount of balefire, because the DO can also otherwise obviously transmigrate Forsaken everywhere in the world; at least the Forsaken never mentioned that they are only "immortal", if they don't die too far away from SG (and in the end of TFoH, the DO's powers on all of the Westlands were anway very much grown, as seen by the unnatural weather). In the same way, I could claim that it plays a role concerning transmigration if you are a man or a women, if you are balefired with a very small amount of balefire, though there isn't any indication in this Q&A that this would be the case. Basically, the idea that distance to SG would be in any way important for the transmigration of a balefired person, is just unsupported speculation.

RJ and BS mention a few other RAFO limits and circumstances of death, except for balefire, which can prevent transmigration and weren't revealed yet. That can hardly mean a death too far away from SG, because following your logic, one would almost always be too far away from SG, and that is something already shown in the books.
Reply to message
The limits of transmigration - 21/07/2010 12:34:20 PM 1181 Views
The EXACT anwer is easy to provide... - 21/07/2010 12:51:48 PM 818 Views
Can't be right - 21/07/2010 01:09:36 PM 798 Views
I don't understand what you're saying here... - 21/07/2010 01:19:13 PM 867 Views
I disagree... - 21/07/2010 01:49:36 PM 731 Views
I think you're going off on a slight tangent here... - 21/07/2010 02:04:30 PM 826 Views
In RJ's explanation... - 21/07/2010 02:32:03 PM 716 Views
THOSE WHO BETRAY ME DIE THE FINAL DEATH! - 22/07/2010 03:30:57 AM 727 Views
Re: The EXACT anwer is easy to provide... - 21/07/2010 02:41:58 PM 760 Views
When I said distance, think of it as "radius" and the no. of threads within that radius... - 21/07/2010 02:57:57 PM 784 Views
OK, I understand ... - 21/07/2010 03:24:34 PM 760 Views
Yes, Pattern proximity, rather than physical proximity... - 21/07/2010 03:37:15 PM 712 Views
Re: Yes, Pattern proximity, rather than physical proximity... - 21/07/2010 04:52:38 PM 706 Views
But as you said... - 21/07/2010 03:01:50 PM 703 Views
Re: But as you said... - 21/07/2010 03:35:51 PM 696 Views
As I understand you and Shannow... - 21/07/2010 03:49:38 PM 731 Views
Re: As I understand you and Shannow... - 21/07/2010 04:34:08 PM 772 Views
I think it's absurd to think relative distance to SG is a factor: - 21/07/2010 04:01:17 PM 899 Views
Indeed... - 21/07/2010 04:29:28 PM 708 Views
Re: The EXACT anwer is easy to provide... - 22/07/2010 02:58:48 AM 713 Views
I don't think it was ever said that the DO had less Power in TAR - 21/07/2010 03:01:31 PM 669 Views
The idea is... - 21/07/2010 03:10:15 PM 739 Views
Hmmm, I'm not really sure if this holds true. - 21/07/2010 03:25:55 PM 686 Views
I would argue... - 21/07/2010 03:39:05 PM 701 Views
Re: I would argue... - 21/07/2010 03:59:53 PM 714 Views
Maybe death by the TP? - 21/07/2010 03:48:16 PM 713 Views
Would surprise me... - 21/07/2010 03:54:37 PM 690 Views
Re: Would surprise me... - 21/07/2010 04:01:08 PM 778 Views
Trying to mask yet another Slayer killed Asmodean argument are we? - 21/07/2010 06:21:57 PM 763 Views
Being grabbed by the Horn would be one. *NM* - 25/07/2010 07:12:17 AM 345 Views

Reply to Message