Active Users:1625 Time:22/10/2025 12:27:39 PM
But we dont know for sure that it took... Nargs Send a noteboard - 04/09/2010 12:24:24 AM
We dont know for sure that it took time for Siuane to lose the ageless look.

NewYorkerAesSedai--
--I'd like to add that Siuan became young-looking again after her stilling--

"Imediately after" or "a while after" is still "after". We dont know for sure if her look slowly/rapidly changed or imediately changed.

From what we can tell from the books at face value, the mechanics of stilling differ from that of releasing.

It "appears", IMHO, that with stilling the affects are much more rapid.

The only thing we have to go on as far as releasing is concerened(over a long period of time) is the possibility that Cadsuane has shed herself of the oaths (which could explain her age). She still has the ageless look.

NewYorkerAesSedai could be correct but we just dont have enough info. Stuff like this gets RAFO'd if I am not mistaken. Maybe it will get touched upon later...
Reply to message
Stilling, the Oath Rod, Black Ajah, the Ageless Face and Verin Sedai - 03/09/2010 09:09:28 PM 1500 Views
obviously, they have their own replacement Oaths *NM* - 03/09/2010 09:12:34 PM 727 Views
Why did I see this post and think it said, "Sitting on the Oath Rod?" - 03/09/2010 09:53:10 PM 775 Views
Bucause you're funny that way! *NM* - 03/09/2010 11:10:03 PM 347 Views
You're not alone. I had a double take as well LOL Get your mind outa the gutter - 04/09/2010 12:08:48 AM 665 Views
Lol. At least it wasn't just me. - 04/09/2010 12:44:41 AM 673 Views
The Black Ajah - 03/09/2010 09:53:39 PM 1072 Views
Remember also that becoming "young" again is not immediate - 03/09/2010 10:47:11 PM 772 Views
But we dont know for sure that it took... - 04/09/2010 12:24:24 AM 783 Views
small problem - 04/09/2010 01:14:03 AM 806 Views
It does, though it's a cosmetic role - 04/09/2010 02:37:36 AM 825 Views
I found a quote afterall! - 04/09/2010 05:30:41 PM 783 Views
We can be pretty sure... - 04/09/2010 01:30:09 AM 763 Views
Re: But we dont know for sure that it took... *NM* - 04/09/2010 04:24:56 AM 286 Views
Unless you were born in the wetlands, refering to her by title is a rather silly affectation *NM* - 04/09/2010 04:16:54 AM 466 Views
That's me, Silly and Affected! - 04/09/2010 11:51:00 PM 638 Views
...WHAT??!?!?! *spoilered* - 04/09/2010 05:14:29 PM 733 Views
why on earth are you on a fan site like this if you haven't read tGS? - 04/09/2010 08:34:55 PM 673 Views
well when people are SO ACCEPTING of others who have other things to do than read fantasy novels.. - 04/09/2010 08:46:31 PM 641 Views
Well, King Kong dies in the end too! - 04/09/2010 09:12:35 PM 687 Views
like i said, I really wasn't trying to accuse you of being a spoilsport - 04/09/2010 09:20:20 PM 785 Views
See that's where you are dead wrong - 04/09/2010 09:55:51 PM 888 Views
take a chill pill sister ... just because you are looking to be insulted doesn't mean I intended too - 04/09/2010 09:53:20 PM 724 Views
and I gave you an answer to your question - 05/09/2010 12:32:35 AM 788 Views
*shrugs* - 05/09/2010 02:56:05 PM 795 Views
why can't we all just get along? and why did this go on for so long that someone had to type that? *NM* - 05/09/2010 03:46:03 AM 311 Views
because it's part of the human condition *NM* - 05/09/2010 02:49:39 PM 315 Views
At this point you can probably borrow it from the public library! *NM* - 07/09/2010 08:01:56 PM 349 Views

Reply to Message