After re-reading TGS and Distinctions I was just wondering what mistakes you've noticed that sanderson made that irk you. nothing that really changes the flow of the story mind you, but the little things.
in TGS for example, people calling rand the Dragon instead of the Dragon Reborn. For example whene egwene is talking to some aes sedai she refers to him as the dragon.
or in distinctions when graendal curses Light! when she's about to be bf'd or referring to the Great Lord as the Dark One.
but the one that irks me the most is that he seems to be using the words weaving when he has the forsaken/rand channeling. if you look at any of the earlier books all the AOL channelers reffer to it as spinning webs, not weavings weaves.
how about you guys?
in TGS for example, people calling rand the Dragon instead of the Dragon Reborn. For example whene egwene is talking to some aes sedai she refers to him as the dragon.
or in distinctions when graendal curses Light! when she's about to be bf'd or referring to the Great Lord as the Dark One.
but the one that irks me the most is that he seems to be using the words weaving when he has the forsaken/rand channeling. if you look at any of the earlier books all the AOL channelers reffer to it as spinning webs, not weavings weaves.
how about you guys?
This message last edited by Sidious on 23/09/2010 at 05:40:32 PM
mistakes sanderson makes that bug you
- 23/09/2010 05:38:52 PM
1880 Views
Bael mentioning the Aiel Waste; characters using words that are too sophisticated or techical
- 23/09/2010 06:11:34 PM
1101 Views
I completely agree...
- 23/09/2010 08:54:17 PM
960 Views
Re: I completely agree...
- 24/09/2010 01:57:38 AM
882 Views
Re: I completely agree...
- 24/09/2010 06:39:17 PM
840 Views
Oh, sh**, Moiraine! I never thought about that! The comments about her in tGS suggest you're right
- 26/09/2010 03:23:56 AM
906 Views
The entire Graendal scene
- 23/09/2010 06:27:03 PM
998 Views
I think this is the type of info that RJ never got around to revealing.
- 23/09/2010 08:46:51 PM
846 Views
Particularly the way he described sex. It reeked of Mormon discomfort with the topic.
- 24/09/2010 02:04:08 AM
877 Views
Reeked? Great word. It seemed quite in line with RJ's own dealings with the topic. *NM*
- 24/09/2010 03:42:28 AM
380 Views
RJ had great sexual humor--he even went a little overboard sometimes IMO
- 24/09/2010 11:28:25 PM
746 Views
Re: RJ had great sexual humor--he even went a little overboard sometimes IMO
- 25/09/2010 08:56:47 PM
780 Views
RJ said breasts all the time, but in a more clinical manner - folding arms under breasts, etc
- 26/09/2010 03:33:09 AM
915 Views
Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too?
- 24/09/2010 04:09:48 AM
853 Views
Re: Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too?
- 24/09/2010 05:36:23 PM
944 Views
A lot of those are reasons why I always thought she was alive..
- 24/09/2010 06:10:35 PM
962 Views
Re: A lot of those are reasons why I always thought she was alive..
- 24/09/2010 07:54:54 PM
816 Views
Re: Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too?
- 25/09/2010 10:02:02 AM
744 Views
Re: Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too?
- 25/09/2010 08:48:05 PM
827 Views
Not really a mistake, I guess
- 25/09/2010 09:45:54 PM
752 Views
Well...
- 26/09/2010 06:30:54 AM
853 Views
Thanks. I think I didn't notice it with RJ because
- 26/09/2010 06:35:47 AM
739 Views
*NM*