Active Users:341 Time:17/06/2025 11:50:53 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim Send a noteboard - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM
It's meant to restrain women and force them to submit to certain restrictions on their lifestyles and choices. There's a REASON it's penis-shaped.
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 968 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work Ava - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 700 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 581 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 584 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. Datakim - 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM 590 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM 551 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* Ava - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 252 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 547 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 687 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 564 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 540 Views
At least they can feel the True Source malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 573 Views
All true. Joel - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 633 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 638 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* Ashaman_Luc - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 224 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* Ava - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 231 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 265 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 229 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 558 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 651 Views
yes Jim - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 621 Views
Re: yes Sidious - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 556 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Jim - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 566 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Evil_Monkey - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 564 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 290 Views
Doubtful Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 568 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 274 Views
Maybe but. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 560 Views
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 581 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes