Active Users:1530 Time:22/09/2026 05:42:54 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim Send a noteboard - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM
It's meant to restrain women and force them to submit to certain restrictions on their lifestyles and choices. There's a REASON it's penis-shaped.
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 1157 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work Ava - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 867 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 767 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 758 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. Datakim - 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM 772 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM 738 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* Ava - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 329 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 725 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 873 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 758 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 732 Views
At least they can feel the True Source malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 771 Views
All true. Joel - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 820 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 803 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* Ashaman_Luc - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 306 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* Ava - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 309 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 347 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 312 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 746 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 826 Views
yes Jim - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 798 Views
Re: yes Sidious - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 735 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Jim - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 740 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Evil_Monkey - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 736 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 377 Views
Doubtful Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 753 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 361 Views
Maybe but. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 743 Views
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 767 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes