Active Users:1100 Time:14/09/2025 09:37:26 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim Send a noteboard - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM
It's meant to restrain women and force them to submit to certain restrictions on their lifestyles and choices. There's a REASON it's penis-shaped.
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 1001 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work Ava - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 726 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 609 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 612 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. Datakim - 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM 619 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM 585 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* Ava - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 268 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 578 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 717 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 595 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 571 Views
At least they can feel the True Source malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 603 Views
All true. Joel - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 664 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 665 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* Ashaman_Luc - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 236 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* Ava - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 244 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 278 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 244 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 587 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 678 Views
yes Jim - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 653 Views
Re: yes Sidious - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 586 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Jim - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 595 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Evil_Monkey - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 596 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 303 Views
Doubtful Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 599 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 287 Views
Maybe but. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 588 Views
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 607 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes