Active Users:166 Time:02/06/2024 03:49:12 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim Send a noteboard - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM
It's meant to restrain women and force them to submit to certain restrictions on their lifestyles and choices. There's a REASON it's penis-shaped.
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 842 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work Ava - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 579 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 452 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 463 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. Datakim - 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM 461 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM 431 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* Ava - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 206 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 421 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 555 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 432 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 412 Views
At least they can feel the True Source malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 439 Views
All true. Joel - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 502 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 516 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* Ashaman_Luc - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 172 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* Ava - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 181 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 211 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 180 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 427 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 517 Views
yes Jim - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 487 Views
Re: yes Sidious - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 432 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Jim - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 431 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Evil_Monkey - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 423 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 237 Views
Doubtful Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 445 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 228 Views
Maybe but. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 431 Views
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 454 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes