Active Users:653 Time:18/12/2025 02:13:36 PM
Re: What is the point of Moiraine malekithe Send a noteboard - 09/11/2010 07:11:17 PM
Lanfear was strong enough to outchannel Rand, Avi and Egwene at the same time. I think she was much stronger than 2 times her strength. More like 50 maybe.


IDK, with 50 times her normal strength she could have exploded an atomic bomb on Rand and Co and left nothing but dust of them.
Reply to message
What is the point of Moiraine - 09/11/2010 06:37:57 AM 1680 Views
She probably knew what she needed to ask for from her visit to Rhuidean - 09/11/2010 07:00:00 AM 1167 Views
The bracelet was introduced in TFoH. - 09/11/2010 09:47:43 AM 1077 Views
it's not a new angreal - 09/11/2010 07:08:19 PM 965 Views
That sa'angreal and Moiraine have lots of history together... its the same one she left for Lanfear - 09/11/2010 07:30:19 AM 1299 Views
That isn't clear at all - 09/11/2010 10:47:30 AM 975 Views
Actually, it is VERY clear. Proof is on page 798, ToM - 09/11/2010 02:04:58 PM 1011 Views
You're right... didn't see that. *NM* - 09/11/2010 09:42:43 PM 453 Views
Re: What is the point of Moiraine - 09/11/2010 07:30:30 AM 1081 Views
Re: What is the point of Moiraine - 09/11/2010 07:11:17 PM 968 Views
But she didn't want to. - 09/11/2010 07:24:24 PM 1125 Views
Re: What is the point of Moiraine - 09/11/2010 07:32:13 AM 1107 Views
I don't care if this is the only reason - 09/11/2010 08:05:45 AM 993 Views
Regardless, something is off. - 09/11/2010 09:36:14 AM 1071 Views
Re: Regardless, something is off. - 09/11/2010 11:20:38 AM 1041 Views
comparing angreals - 09/11/2010 07:21:26 PM 1014 Views
Re: comparing angreals - 09/11/2010 08:35:42 PM 910 Views
You'd need to take it up with RJ, I imagine. - 09/11/2010 04:34:04 PM 1130 Views
Re: What is the point of Moiraine - 09/11/2010 04:55:30 PM 895 Views
It shows us why Cyndane is weaker than Lanfear. *NM* - 09/11/2010 05:25:34 PM 496 Views
I don't know. She should have stayed dead. - 09/11/2010 07:38:58 PM 928 Views
Moiraine may not be the whole point - 09/11/2010 10:29:11 PM 994 Views

Reply to Message