Active Users:812 Time:08/02/2026 10:10:22 AM
Re: What is the point of Moiraine malekithe Send a noteboard - 09/11/2010 07:11:17 PM
Lanfear was strong enough to outchannel Rand, Avi and Egwene at the same time. I think she was much stronger than 2 times her strength. More like 50 maybe.


IDK, with 50 times her normal strength she could have exploded an atomic bomb on Rand and Co and left nothing but dust of them.
Reply to message
What is the point of Moiraine - 09/11/2010 06:37:57 AM 1717 Views
She probably knew what she needed to ask for from her visit to Rhuidean - 09/11/2010 07:00:00 AM 1208 Views
The bracelet was introduced in TFoH. - 09/11/2010 09:47:43 AM 1099 Views
it's not a new angreal - 09/11/2010 07:08:19 PM 1003 Views
That sa'angreal and Moiraine have lots of history together... its the same one she left for Lanfear - 09/11/2010 07:30:19 AM 1348 Views
That isn't clear at all - 09/11/2010 10:47:30 AM 1011 Views
Actually, it is VERY clear. Proof is on page 798, ToM - 09/11/2010 02:04:58 PM 1052 Views
You're right... didn't see that. *NM* - 09/11/2010 09:42:43 PM 468 Views
Re: What is the point of Moiraine - 09/11/2010 07:30:30 AM 1121 Views
Re: What is the point of Moiraine - 09/11/2010 07:11:17 PM 999 Views
But she didn't want to. - 09/11/2010 07:24:24 PM 1166 Views
Re: What is the point of Moiraine - 09/11/2010 07:32:13 AM 1139 Views
I don't care if this is the only reason - 09/11/2010 08:05:45 AM 1023 Views
Regardless, something is off. - 09/11/2010 09:36:14 AM 1110 Views
Re: Regardless, something is off. - 09/11/2010 11:20:38 AM 1071 Views
comparing angreals - 09/11/2010 07:21:26 PM 1049 Views
Re: comparing angreals - 09/11/2010 08:35:42 PM 950 Views
You'd need to take it up with RJ, I imagine. - 09/11/2010 04:34:04 PM 1166 Views
Re: What is the point of Moiraine - 09/11/2010 04:55:30 PM 934 Views
It shows us why Cyndane is weaker than Lanfear. *NM* - 09/11/2010 05:25:34 PM 509 Views
I don't know. She should have stayed dead. - 09/11/2010 07:38:58 PM 952 Views
Moiraine may not be the whole point - 09/11/2010 10:29:11 PM 1033 Views

Reply to Message