Active Users:856 Time:07/08/2025 07:18:25 AM
Exactly what I was thinking. His claim of one more book was always bullshit. *NM* everynametaken Send a noteboard - 10/11/2010 03:36:17 AM
ToM would have been 3 books if Jordan wrote them, and MoL would probably be 5. For all the complaints about the things jumping around, can you imagine the backlash if the series ended up been 20 books instead of 14. It just shows how riduculous Jordan's statement of finishing in one book really was and how unwieldy the series had become.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
Anyone else wonder how the hell everything will get wrapped up in 1 more book? - 05/11/2010 10:31:05 PM 1649 Views
I'm not worried about it as long as there's plenty o' Mo *NM* - 05/11/2010 10:51:02 PM 422 Views
Re: I'm not worried about it as long as there's plenty o' Mo - 05/11/2010 10:52:13 PM 866 Views
Re: I'm not worried about it as long as there's plenty o' Mo - 05/11/2010 11:05:49 PM 845 Views
I think Mo (and her new angreal) will the the third with Rand and Nyn *NM* - 06/11/2010 03:50:07 PM 418 Views
I'm 99%, plus... - 10/11/2010 03:44:48 AM 687 Views
The climax of ToM should have been mid-plot - 06/11/2010 12:06:14 AM 1208 Views
If it sucks as much as Towers of Midnight, I don't care. - 06/11/2010 12:07:38 AM 1547 Views
Agreed - 06/11/2010 02:12:41 AM 867 Views
Re: If it sucks as much as Towers of Midnight, I don't care. - 06/11/2010 04:02:48 AM 1569 Views
I tend to think a LOT more things stalled Jordan. - 06/11/2010 05:29:50 AM 979 Views
- 06/11/2010 06:04:52 PM 736 Views
Well... - 07/11/2010 06:03:31 PM 900 Views
Nice analysis. *NM* - 15/11/2010 01:45:10 AM 310 Views
It won't. - 06/11/2010 12:30:47 AM 817 Views
Re: It won't. - 06/11/2010 05:50:10 AM 742 Views
Re: It won't. - 23/11/2010 02:46:52 PM 716 Views
It would have taken Jordan 4 or 5 more..... - 06/11/2010 03:44:30 PM 795 Views
Exactly what I was thinking. His claim of one more book was always bullshit. *NM* - 10/11/2010 03:36:17 AM 325 Views

Reply to Message