Active Users:217 Time:09/05/2024 03:34:27 AM
Exactly what I was thinking. His claim of one more book was always bullshit. *NM* everynametaken Send a noteboard - 10/11/2010 03:36:17 AM
ToM would have been 3 books if Jordan wrote them, and MoL would probably be 5. For all the complaints about the things jumping around, can you imagine the backlash if the series ended up been 20 books instead of 14. It just shows how riduculous Jordan's statement of finishing in one book really was and how unwieldy the series had become.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
Anyone else wonder how the hell everything will get wrapped up in 1 more book? - 05/11/2010 10:31:05 PM 1459 Views
I'm not worried about it as long as there's plenty o' Mo *NM* - 05/11/2010 10:51:02 PM 355 Views
Re: I'm not worried about it as long as there's plenty o' Mo - 05/11/2010 10:52:13 PM 708 Views
Re: I'm not worried about it as long as there's plenty o' Mo - 05/11/2010 11:05:49 PM 677 Views
I think Mo (and her new angreal) will the the third with Rand and Nyn *NM* - 06/11/2010 03:50:07 PM 351 Views
I'm 99%, plus... - 10/11/2010 03:44:48 AM 519 Views
The climax of ToM should have been mid-plot - 06/11/2010 12:06:14 AM 1034 Views
If it sucks as much as Towers of Midnight, I don't care. - 06/11/2010 12:07:38 AM 1386 Views
Agreed - 06/11/2010 02:12:41 AM 702 Views
Re: If it sucks as much as Towers of Midnight, I don't care. - 06/11/2010 04:02:48 AM 1397 Views
I tend to think a LOT more things stalled Jordan. - 06/11/2010 05:29:50 AM 821 Views
- 06/11/2010 06:04:52 PM 568 Views
Well... - 07/11/2010 06:03:31 PM 712 Views
Nice analysis. *NM* - 15/11/2010 01:45:10 AM 253 Views
It won't. - 06/11/2010 12:30:47 AM 641 Views
Re: It won't. - 06/11/2010 05:50:10 AM 584 Views
Re: It won't. - 23/11/2010 02:46:52 PM 557 Views
It would have taken Jordan 4 or 5 more..... - 06/11/2010 03:44:30 PM 621 Views
Exactly what I was thinking. His claim of one more book was always bullshit. *NM* - 10/11/2010 03:36:17 AM 257 Views

Reply to Message