Active Users:339 Time:29/03/2026 05:47:25 PM
Re: The entry is misleading Zeratul Send a noteboard - 10/11/2010 06:00:28 PM
Why doesn't it say that Graendal "killed" Asmodean, if she actually wasn't just "responsible" (also SH used the word "responsible", not that Graendal killed Asmo). It makes sense, though, if a "tool" of Graendal killed Asmo, namely Slayer (perhaps as Luc, who knows the Caemlyn Palace of course).

Probably Brandon and Harriet wanted to leave just a little bit of a wiggle room for the supporters of the other theories.
But why would she be listed a s ruthless killer? If we discount Asmo, we haven't see her anyone in the series IIRC, certainly nobody of notice.

Anyway, even without the new evidence in ToM I've always discounted the Slayer reason for one simple reason - as far as he knows, Asmo is an extremely strong channeller. So Slayer giving him a chance to see him and react before killing him is absolutely idiotic. Why risk if instead killing from behind with a dagger or an arrow? He certainly had no qualms about attacking Perrin from ambushes numerous times, even though this was a battle where Slayer expected to have an advantage due to his bigger experience with T'A'R.

Reply to message
"Responsibility" *spoilers* - 10/11/2010 08:18:04 AM 2400 Views
how was graendal responsible for mesaana? - 10/11/2010 10:41:05 AM 2217 Views
Shaidar Haran sees it that way *NM* - 10/11/2010 10:51:13 AM 1120 Views
Re: Shaidar Haran sees it that way - 10/11/2010 11:20:55 AM 2005 Views
Yeah, and that's a pretty far-fetched sight by SH - 10/11/2010 11:34:42 AM 2142 Views
I didn't mean Asmo with that comment *NM* - 11/11/2010 12:18:51 PM 971 Views
Oh come on..... give it up. Your theory is dead. - 10/11/2010 12:28:35 PM 2189 Views
Well, I disagree... - 10/11/2010 01:09:02 PM 1861 Views
The Glossary entry - 10/11/2010 01:23:22 PM 1871 Views
The entry is misleading - 10/11/2010 01:35:20 PM 1716 Views
Re: The entry is misleading - 10/11/2010 03:47:00 PM 1643 Views
Probably the glossary of AMoL, where this will be revealed, will have such an entry. - 10/11/2010 03:55:40 PM 1837 Views
Re: Probably the glossary of AMoL, where this will be revealed, will have such an entry. - 10/11/2010 04:32:29 PM 1702 Views
This is a misquote - 10/11/2010 04:41:59 PM 1747 Views
Re: This is a misquote - 10/11/2010 05:16:21 PM 1700 Views
Slayer uses surprise and quickness. - 10/11/2010 05:38:10 PM 1672 Views
Your pet theory is wrong, get over it. *NM* - 10/11/2010 06:43:22 PM 870 Views
I doubt it... - 10/11/2010 06:52:08 PM 1729 Views
Re: The entry is misleading - 10/11/2010 06:00:28 PM 1693 Views
I rather think it is a trick by BS - 10/11/2010 07:17:49 PM 1955 Views
Re: I rather think it is a trick by BS - 10/11/2010 08:20:20 PM 1744 Views
Not directly as the last cause... - 10/11/2010 08:39:08 PM 1752 Views
Re: Not directly as the last cause... - 11/11/2010 02:42:19 PM 1630 Views
Not Wilson - 11/11/2010 03:48:50 AM 1909 Views
as I've stated before - 11/11/2010 03:42:47 AM 1695 Views
It has been confirmed by Brandon - 11/11/2010 03:44:20 AM 1739 Views
Where did BS say this? *NM* - 11/11/2010 12:07:27 PM 915 Views
I know you are conversant with the Interview Database... - 11/11/2010 12:36:30 PM 1775 Views
Hmm... - 11/11/2010 01:03:55 PM 2302 Views
Re: Hmm... - 11/11/2010 01:11:45 PM 1686 Views

Reply to Message