He just needs two women to stabilize the flaw. There's no strength requirement as far as we know (unlike the Choedan Kal). Elze and Merise have used Callandor, and while they're both stronger than Moiraine, they weren't exceptional at all.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Just finished - comments and questions (spoilers)
- 17/11/2010 04:50:19 AM
1806 Views
Re: Just finished - comments and questions (spoilers)
- 17/11/2010 04:55:37 AM
1294 Views
Re: Just finished - comments and questions (spoilers)
- 17/11/2010 05:09:43 AM
1262 Views
My ideas on Moiraine (but they aren't very original or exciting)
- 17/11/2010 05:17:36 AM
1101 Views
Re: My ideas on Moiraine (but they aren't very original or exciting)
- 17/11/2010 01:15:30 PM
1077 Views
I haven't forgotten Alivia. It would just suck if it was her. Nynaeve and Moiraine would
- 18/11/2010 01:11:08 AM
976 Views
Moiraine is far too weak to be of use as a channeling partner with Callandor. *NM*
- 18/11/2010 01:27:59 PM
459 Views
Re: Just finished - comments and questions (spoilers)
- 17/11/2010 05:19:54 AM
1229 Views
Very interesting point about Lanfear.....
- 17/11/2010 05:31:16 AM
1228 Views
Re: Very interesting point about Lanfear.....
- 17/11/2010 08:35:58 AM
1085 Views
That would piss me off, seeing as it's her fault Moiraine had to be food
*NM*
- 17/11/2010 09:37:29 AM
474 Views
*NM*
- 17/11/2010 09:37:29 AM
474 Views
Re: That would piss me off, seeing as it's her fault Moiraine had to be food
- 17/11/2010 09:49:53 AM
972 Views
- 17/11/2010 09:49:53 AM
972 Views
Ya. I understand it. I'd just prefer if Rand gets to make his choice again, and kills her this time
- 17/11/2010 09:54:25 AM
1021 Views
This is new Rand though
- 17/11/2010 11:30:40 AM
1000 Views
I bet she would turn if it would mean Rand "accepting" her but not otherwise.
- 17/11/2010 11:56:15 AM
1031 Views
Re: I bet she would turn if it would mean Rand "accepting" her but not otherwise.
- 17/11/2010 12:06:40 PM
1049 Views
Re: I bet she would turn if it would mean Rand "accepting" her but not otherwise.
- 18/11/2010 06:36:32 AM
1023 Views
