Active Users:620 Time:03/08/2025 02:07:59 AM
RJ was never good with relationships. eucatastrophe Send a noteboard - 21/11/2010 08:52:43 PM
It became clear to me that Thom loved her when he became obsessed with saving her. However. I (like Mat) did not see it happen.

Was it there and I missed it, or .. you know, was it not there?


Having said that, Deadsy is awesome for her post.

Personally, I believed Lan and Nynaeve, but the thing is, given how WoT relationships play out, there's a whole lot of the middle missing.

The stuff Deadsy pointed out, and the stuff from EotW is basically Point A. You don't go from that to pledging everlasting love (which our WoT characters basically do). Point B (making memories with said person on an intimate level) is sorely missing.

IMO Rand/Elayne, Egwene/Gawyn, and to an extent Rand/Min are the worst offenders while Perrin/Faile, Siuan/Bryne, and Rand/Aviendha are the least.
Reply to message
Thom and Moiraine - 19/11/2010 02:39:16 PM 1439 Views
Re: Thom and Moiraine - 19/11/2010 02:56:49 PM 975 Views
Re: Thom and Moiraine - 19/11/2010 03:00:13 PM 1255 Views
Ah yes.. - 19/11/2010 03:07:28 PM 911 Views
Re: Thom and Moiraine - 19/11/2010 04:13:54 PM 1036 Views
Yes, and that was after the fact - 19/11/2010 04:21:55 PM 924 Views
It was there, but subtle. - 19/11/2010 11:25:39 PM 1085 Views
I <3 you right now. - 20/11/2010 02:48:03 AM 831 Views
It was there, but it never made any sense at all. - 20/11/2010 06:33:12 AM 857 Views
It's been made abundantly clear throughout the series that women of all ages are attracted to Thom - 20/11/2010 07:10:05 AM 992 Views
Hotties! - 20/11/2010 09:11:39 AM 894 Views
Alan Rickman is never off topic! *NM* - 20/11/2010 10:50:36 AM 383 Views
*NM* - 20/11/2010 11:12:01 AM 478 Views
I've always felt the same with Lan/Nynaeve - 20/11/2010 06:44:15 AM 847 Views
I saw this one happening. - 20/11/2010 02:57:12 PM 809 Views
Yep, it was pretty well built up imo. - 28/11/2010 12:43:50 PM 789 Views
RJ was never good with relationships. - 21/11/2010 08:52:43 PM 839 Views

Reply to Message