Active Users:647 Time:19/12/2025 08:20:42 AM
RJ was never good with relationships. eucatastrophe Send a noteboard - 21/11/2010 08:52:43 PM
It became clear to me that Thom loved her when he became obsessed with saving her. However. I (like Mat) did not see it happen.

Was it there and I missed it, or .. you know, was it not there?


Having said that, Deadsy is awesome for her post.

Personally, I believed Lan and Nynaeve, but the thing is, given how WoT relationships play out, there's a whole lot of the middle missing.

The stuff Deadsy pointed out, and the stuff from EotW is basically Point A. You don't go from that to pledging everlasting love (which our WoT characters basically do). Point B (making memories with said person on an intimate level) is sorely missing.

IMO Rand/Elayne, Egwene/Gawyn, and to an extent Rand/Min are the worst offenders while Perrin/Faile, Siuan/Bryne, and Rand/Aviendha are the least.
Reply to message
Thom and Moiraine - 19/11/2010 02:39:16 PM 1521 Views
Re: Thom and Moiraine - 19/11/2010 02:56:49 PM 1056 Views
Re: Thom and Moiraine - 19/11/2010 03:00:13 PM 1373 Views
Ah yes.. - 19/11/2010 03:07:28 PM 995 Views
Re: Thom and Moiraine - 19/11/2010 04:13:54 PM 1143 Views
Yes, and that was after the fact - 19/11/2010 04:21:55 PM 999 Views
It was there, but subtle. - 19/11/2010 11:25:39 PM 1217 Views
I <3 you right now. - 20/11/2010 02:48:03 AM 926 Views
It was there, but it never made any sense at all. - 20/11/2010 06:33:12 AM 960 Views
It's been made abundantly clear throughout the series that women of all ages are attracted to Thom - 20/11/2010 07:10:05 AM 1071 Views
Hotties! - 20/11/2010 09:11:39 AM 1008 Views
Alan Rickman is never off topic! *NM* - 20/11/2010 10:50:36 AM 436 Views
*NM* - 20/11/2010 11:12:01 AM 545 Views
I've always felt the same with Lan/Nynaeve - 20/11/2010 06:44:15 AM 948 Views
I saw this one happening. - 20/11/2010 02:57:12 PM 897 Views
Yep, it was pretty well built up imo. - 28/11/2010 12:43:50 PM 871 Views
RJ was never good with relationships. - 21/11/2010 08:52:43 PM 935 Views

Reply to Message