Active Users:358 Time:30/04/2025 09:11:47 PM
RJ was never good with relationships. eucatastrophe Send a noteboard - 21/11/2010 08:52:43 PM
It became clear to me that Thom loved her when he became obsessed with saving her. However. I (like Mat) did not see it happen.

Was it there and I missed it, or .. you know, was it not there?


Having said that, Deadsy is awesome for her post.

Personally, I believed Lan and Nynaeve, but the thing is, given how WoT relationships play out, there's a whole lot of the middle missing.

The stuff Deadsy pointed out, and the stuff from EotW is basically Point A. You don't go from that to pledging everlasting love (which our WoT characters basically do). Point B (making memories with said person on an intimate level) is sorely missing.

IMO Rand/Elayne, Egwene/Gawyn, and to an extent Rand/Min are the worst offenders while Perrin/Faile, Siuan/Bryne, and Rand/Aviendha are the least.
Reply to message
Thom and Moiraine - 19/11/2010 02:39:16 PM 1403 Views
Re: Thom and Moiraine - 19/11/2010 02:56:49 PM 947 Views
Re: Thom and Moiraine - 19/11/2010 03:00:13 PM 1225 Views
Ah yes.. - 19/11/2010 03:07:28 PM 880 Views
Re: Thom and Moiraine - 19/11/2010 04:13:54 PM 1002 Views
Yes, and that was after the fact - 19/11/2010 04:21:55 PM 894 Views
It was there, but subtle. - 19/11/2010 11:25:39 PM 1050 Views
I <3 you right now. - 20/11/2010 02:48:03 AM 798 Views
It was there, but it never made any sense at all. - 20/11/2010 06:33:12 AM 823 Views
It's been made abundantly clear throughout the series that women of all ages are attracted to Thom - 20/11/2010 07:10:05 AM 961 Views
Hotties! - 20/11/2010 09:11:39 AM 846 Views
Alan Rickman is never off topic! *NM* - 20/11/2010 10:50:36 AM 370 Views
*NM* - 20/11/2010 11:12:01 AM 443 Views
I've always felt the same with Lan/Nynaeve - 20/11/2010 06:44:15 AM 817 Views
I saw this one happening. - 20/11/2010 02:57:12 PM 781 Views
Yep, it was pretty well built up imo. - 28/11/2010 12:43:50 PM 755 Views
RJ was never good with relationships. - 21/11/2010 08:52:43 PM 781 Views

Reply to Message