Active Users:416 Time:17/06/2025 12:46:39 AM
Re: Not really - the taint was the result of an improper Seal Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 04:11:35 AM
So if Rand and his friends Sealed the Dark One away properly, neither half would be tainted.


This is supposition. We know the Seals weren't perfect, but we aren't told why. Rand/LTT's best guess so far is that it failed because only Saidin was used, but RJ said that if both halves were used, both would have been tainted.

There was a distinct possibility that the only way to Seal the Bore for good would be to allow both powers to be Tainted (and perhaps the Taint would fade away by the next cycle of the Wheel - even after just 3000 years it seems to be much less virulent than it was during the Breaking).
This message last edited by Lord Haart on 30/11/2010 at 04:11:46 AM
Reply to message
Saidin and Saidar - 29/11/2010 02:12:42 AM 1284 Views
Why does the OP usage need to disappear for rand to succeed? - 29/11/2010 02:49:36 AM 844 Views
Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". - 29/11/2010 03:10:20 AM 748 Views
Re: Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". - 30/11/2010 12:07:20 PM 714 Views
how do cannons out-range channelers? Rand says he can channel up to 5 miles away. - 30/11/2010 08:37:34 PM 681 Views
In order for time to conitune along it's wheel-like path. - 29/11/2010 01:36:08 PM 1003 Views
Oh yes, it's a huge giveaway by brandon... - 29/11/2010 05:09:19 PM 770 Views
Whichever author wrote it, fact remains that it's a pretty big reveal. - 30/11/2010 04:08:30 AM 665 Views
Of course there is - 30/11/2010 10:01:09 AM 683 Views
Not really - the taint was the result of an improper Seal - 29/11/2010 05:52:56 PM 807 Views
Re: Not really - the taint was the result of an improper Seal - 30/11/2010 04:11:35 AM 675 Views
Re: Saidin and Saidar - 29/11/2010 11:26:49 PM 688 Views
Yes, I know that. - 30/11/2010 04:13:12 AM 788 Views
Re: Saidin and Saidar - 05/12/2010 08:40:01 AM 777 Views

Reply to Message