Active Users:510 Time:04/03/2026 03:08:24 AM
Re: Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". Culhane0428 Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 12:07:20 PM
I thought the idea is that touching the dark one with the OP is what tainted it. Rand knows this, and he will find a way to avoid touching the dark one with OP while sealing the dark one to such a state that it is eventually forgotten. I suggest this will require the shadar logoth power--Moridin's "old enemy, old friend"

My best guess is that he will use the unbuffered callandor with the two most powerful women available (Alivia and Nynaeve) to channel all of the true power into the shadar logoth ruby. It is totally possible the dagger will be lodged in his side at the time, and he will burn himself to ashes in the process.... hence..... blood and bloody ashes. I'm only half joking.

Reply to message
Saidin and Saidar - 29/11/2010 02:12:42 AM 1470 Views
Why does the OP usage need to disappear for rand to succeed? - 29/11/2010 02:49:36 AM 1006 Views
Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". - 29/11/2010 03:10:20 AM 904 Views
Re: Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". - 30/11/2010 12:07:20 PM 898 Views
how do cannons out-range channelers? Rand says he can channel up to 5 miles away. - 30/11/2010 08:37:34 PM 837 Views
In order for time to conitune along it's wheel-like path. - 29/11/2010 01:36:08 PM 1168 Views
Oh yes, it's a huge giveaway by brandon... - 29/11/2010 05:09:19 PM 918 Views
Whichever author wrote it, fact remains that it's a pretty big reveal. - 30/11/2010 04:08:30 AM 828 Views
Of course there is - 30/11/2010 10:01:09 AM 829 Views
Not really - the taint was the result of an improper Seal - 29/11/2010 05:52:56 PM 980 Views
Re: Not really - the taint was the result of an improper Seal - 30/11/2010 04:11:35 AM 842 Views
Re: Saidin and Saidar - 29/11/2010 11:26:49 PM 828 Views
Yes, I know that. - 30/11/2010 04:13:12 AM 922 Views
Re: Saidin and Saidar - 05/12/2010 08:40:01 AM 913 Views

Reply to Message