if she just said 'open this letter in 5 days' she'd be betraying the shadow, because she still thought it might be possible she'd be alive then. So she had to say 'open it only if I don't come back', because she knew/convinced herself the only way she wouldn't come back is if she was dead. Then she had to say 'in 30 days' because she had to set a reasonable time (even though she says in the letter she'd be back in a day if she was alive).
I think the '30 days' and 'do what it says' parts are meant to indicate that she was trying to arouse his curiousity so he'd for sure open it. But really, she could have just said 'if I don't come back in 5 days, open this letter and read it', without betraying the shadow.
So yeah, it seems stupid.
I think the '30 days' and 'do what it says' parts are meant to indicate that she was trying to arouse his curiousity so he'd for sure open it. But really, she could have just said 'if I don't come back in 5 days, open this letter and read it', without betraying the shadow.
So yeah, it seems stupid.
In defense of Verin
- 30/11/2010 06:58:25 PM
1196 Views
Re: In defense of Verin
- 30/11/2010 07:01:13 PM
871 Views
It's done in order to put his taveren nature at the forefront
- 30/11/2010 07:25:28 PM
788 Views
I'm pretty sure her obligation not to betray the Shadow had the most to do with it. *NM*
- 30/11/2010 07:27:10 PM
275 Views
Re: It's done in order to put his taveren nature at the forefront
- 30/11/2010 10:25:13 PM
688 Views
It changes it by ensuring he doesn't open the letter before she returns
- 30/11/2010 10:31:49 PM
670 Views
yeah exactly
- 01/12/2010 03:38:16 AM
913 Views
Re: yeah exactly
- 01/12/2010 09:58:25 AM
626 Views
She could NOT have told him he could open it freely, that would be too close to breaking her Oath
- 02/12/2010 11:14:40 AM
564 Views