Active Users:374 Time:01/05/2025 08:05:33 PM
Why do we have stronger channelers now? GameMaster Send a noteboard - 02/12/2010 04:50:18 PM
This I believe is the intervention of the Pattern itself. Stronger channelers were needed for the LB and the Pattern provided. If the LB wouldn't have happened for another 2 thousand years all of those who channel wouldve been in big trouble, with less channelers and much weaker ones at that.
Reply to message
/ Theory - Decline in the number of chanellers - 01/12/2010 02:24:23 PM 1226 Views
Numbers - 01/12/2010 04:09:02 PM 727 Views
Re: / Theory - Decline in the number of chanellers - 01/12/2010 07:55:42 PM 1102 Views
Re: / Theory - Decline in the number of chanellers - 01/12/2010 09:14:48 PM 978 Views
Thank god for that - 01/12/2010 09:35:22 PM 749 Views
Partly correct. - 02/12/2010 04:40:13 PM 812 Views
Why do we have stronger channelers now? - 02/12/2010 04:50:18 PM 659 Views
you'd think the Seanchan would have even lower numbers of channellers - 02/12/2010 05:13:36 PM 717 Views
Maybe over time - 02/12/2010 07:24:08 PM 576 Views
The consolidation only ended (relatively) recently though - 03/12/2010 02:49:22 AM 683 Views
yes and no - 04/12/2010 02:20:13 PM 680 Views
Re: yes and no - 04/12/2010 03:06:10 PM 634 Views
Not so, common folk don't trust Wilders either... - 04/12/2010 03:16:40 PM 784 Views
Re: Not so, common folk don't trust Wilders either... - 05/12/2010 04:17:40 PM 631 Views
Don't mistake Wilders with women like Sharina - 05/12/2010 04:27:45 PM 654 Views
Re: Don't mistake Wilders with women like Sharina - 06/12/2010 04:23:52 PM 572 Views
none of the others could actively channel. - 06/12/2010 04:34:31 PM 807 Views

Reply to Message