All right, that would be reasonable. But Wolf souls die for good in the Dreamworld because that's where dead wolves go. Aside from Heroes of the Horn, dead humans don't go to the Dreamworld, do they?
RJ said there's an afterworld where souls go to await rebirth. If it's TAR for humans too, it's not in the same dimension of TAR.
Hopper had no idea where humans go.
My hunch is that wolfbrothers become wolves in TAR after they die however, so perhaps Hopper's warning is true enough for Perrin. It may also be true if you die in TAR while there in the flesh. Perhaps your soul then becomes "lost", unable to reach the "soul pool".
Hopper may be quite wrong too, even about the wolves. Perhaps the wolves that die in TAR simply stop being reincarnated as wolves to rejoin the soul pool, and that's why the wolves believe these souls have died the final death (perhaps the souls of those wolves that died in TAR when they are reborn as human become wolfbrothers?). As RJ pointed out, souls are immortal - not even balefire can destroy them. It's very curious that dying in TAR while not incarnated (or even when incarnated) would destroy your soul. I suspect only Shai'tan can destroy souls.
Depending if Rand literally "dies" or not, I guess we might learn more about the afterlife in the last book.
Egwene and the WIse Ones don't know the most basic thing about Teleranriod
- 02/12/2010 10:43:16 PM
2106 Views
IIRC Nicola was killed by a Black Ajah Sister and Egwene had tried to save her.
- 02/12/2010 10:52:01 PM
1385 Views
Yes, I meant allowing her near the battle in the first place
- 03/12/2010 06:28:45 AM
908 Views
And who would enforce those rules?
- 03/12/2010 12:42:33 PM
1046 Views
Also, I'm not sure how you could expect the Wise Ones to know that.
- 03/12/2010 02:51:43 PM
914 Views
How do you figure?
- 02/12/2010 10:55:15 PM
1115 Views
Re: How do you figure?
- 02/12/2010 11:06:29 PM
1199 Views
may, being the operative word.
- 02/12/2010 11:12:49 PM
1023 Views
except for the part of the soul that stays in the sleeping body, like they've explained many times. *NM*
- 02/12/2010 11:16:43 PM
481 Views
mmm fair point. maybe if you were there "too strongly"?
- 02/12/2010 11:18:50 PM
1027 Views
right. but i dont think 'too strongly' ever means completely. maybe in the flesh or something
*NM*
- 03/12/2010 01:24:38 AM
510 Views
*NM*
- 03/12/2010 01:24:38 AM
510 Views
Oh, I see.
- 02/12/2010 11:45:37 PM
1082 Views
Re: Oh, I see.
- 03/12/2010 02:29:30 AM
1082 Views
Re: Oh, I see.
- 03/12/2010 02:45:59 AM
1000 Views
He isn't a wolfbrother
- 03/12/2010 05:43:06 AM
1056 Views
You raise an interesting possibility
- 03/12/2010 06:44:18 AM
1153 Views
Wolfbrothers are going to be part of the next age.
- 03/12/2010 07:05:30 AM
894 Views
I thought they were just a transitional thing
- 03/12/2010 07:13:17 AM
994 Views
I doubt it, that Age is ours.
- 03/12/2010 09:33:03 PM
882 Views
I know RJ said something
- 04/12/2010 06:15:51 AM
869 Views
Re: I know RJ said something
- 04/12/2010 07:05:50 AM
961 Views
So...
- 04/12/2010 07:24:07 AM
993 Views
Re: So...
- 04/12/2010 10:12:45 AM
947 Views
Of course...
- 05/12/2010 08:21:05 PM
1059 Views
If the first age is the Technological / Scientific Age
- 06/12/2010 06:33:18 AM
993 Views
I don't see why they would have to be unique themes.
- 06/12/2010 07:04:08 AM
937 Views
I don't even know why they're supposed to be mutually exclusive. *NM*
- 06/12/2010 07:37:35 AM
475 Views
No, because Heroes and Wolves are both different from run of the mill humans
- 03/12/2010 09:19:05 AM
1005 Views
That's far from "the most basic" thing and it is entirely excusable that they do not know it.
- 02/12/2010 11:17:46 PM
1099 Views
Re: That's far from "the most basic" thing and it is entirely excusable that they do not know it.
- 03/12/2010 02:42:39 AM
1034 Views
It could be extrapolated from the fact that it's souls that inhabit it
- 03/12/2010 06:54:40 AM
942 Views
You're caving to bias from being outside the story with more information than any single character.
- 03/12/2010 09:13:12 AM
959 Views
Don't forget the Heroes
- 03/12/2010 09:34:43 AM
837 Views
I think that she meant that comment as more for the "hero" version
- 03/12/2010 10:57:38 AM
914 Views
Maybe this should be a question for Sanderson?
- 03/12/2010 11:43:54 AM
927 Views
that's only because you're stubbornly holding to yours, despite everyone indicating its errors
*NM*
- 03/12/2010 05:29:15 PM
550 Views
*NM*
- 03/12/2010 05:29:15 PM
550 Views
Obviously my tenacity indicates that I have a worthy point
- 03/12/2010 07:06:18 PM
738 Views
Perrin doesn't count since his information is from Hopper
- 03/12/2010 09:58:01 PM
938 Views
Incidentally, wouldn't that mean it is safer to go to Tel'aran'rhiod in the flesh? *NM*
- 03/12/2010 09:35:21 PM
466 Views
I'm more inclined to believe that being killed in the flesh in TAR
- 04/12/2010 07:35:15 PM
856 Views
Where does that reasoning begin?
- 04/12/2010 07:53:42 PM
1442 Views
Perhaps it's more of a matter that the "usual route" may be altered?
- 04/12/2010 10:20:51 PM
831 Views
But human souls don't go to Tel'aran'rhiod, from what we know.
- 04/12/2010 11:19:53 PM
843 Views
maybe it does?
- 05/12/2010 12:18:05 AM
1180 Views
So do we have any reason to believe this is the case? *NM*
- 05/12/2010 02:48:48 AM
457 Views
Not @ all - if humans regularly go to TAR after they die, we'd have seen it already. Heroes would
- 04/12/2010 01:28:45 AM
1031 Views

